These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7673862)

  • 1. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953).
    Wood NL; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1995 Sep; 124(3):243-62. PubMed ID: 7673862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel?
    Wood N; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Jan; 21(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 7876773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distraction at the cocktail party: Attenuation of the irrelevant speech effect after a training of auditory selective attention.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jan; 46(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 31436452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acute alcohol intoxication and the cocktail party problem: do "mocktails" help or hinder?
    Harvey AJ; Beaman CP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Nov; 238(11):3083-3093. PubMed ID: 34313803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity.
    Conway AR; Cowan N; Bunting MF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11495122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there implicit memory without attention? A reexamination of task demands in Eich's (1984) procedure.
    Wood NL; Stadler MA; Cowan N
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):772-9. PubMed ID: 9421562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The irrelevant speech effect in backward recall is modulated by foreknowledge of recall direction and response modality.
    Guitard D; Saint-Aubin J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 75(3):245-260. PubMed ID: 33779189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC; Neely CB; Wilson JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Mar; 23(2):472-83. PubMed ID: 9080015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The process of auditory distraction: disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment.
    Zeamer C; Fox Tree JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1463-72. PubMed ID: 23565786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.
    Elliott EM
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Apr; 30(3):478-87. PubMed ID: 12061768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Right Temporoparietal Junction Supports Speech Tracking During Selective Listening: Evidence from Concurrent EEG-fMRI.
    Puschmann S; Steinkamp S; Gillich I; Mirkovic B; Debener S; Thiel CM
    J Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 37(47):11505-11516. PubMed ID: 29061698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dichotic listening and recall in schizophrenia and mania.
    Wielgus MS; Harvey PD
    Schizophr Bull; 1988; 14(4):689-700. PubMed ID: 3217771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between listening to and shadowing a play for selective attention.
    Beech JR; McKeating RL
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 7212129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders.
    De Beni R; Palladino P; Pazzaglia F; Cornoldi C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 9621841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect.
    Neath I; Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 9584441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.
    Martin CS; Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Summers WV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 2526857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.