131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7673909)
1. Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone.
Peters CL; Curtain M; Samuelson KM
J Arthroplasty; 1995 Jun; 10(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 7673909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the Burch-Schneider cage and structural allografts in complex acetabular deficiency: 3- to 10-year follow up.
Hsu CC; Hsu CH; Yen SH; Wang JW
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Oct; 31(10):540-7. PubMed ID: 26520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency.
Chen WM; Engh CA; Hopper RH; McAuley JP; Engh CA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Feb; 82(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 10682728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival Analysis of Allografting and Antiprotrusio Cage in Treating Massive Acetabular Bone Defects.
Chang CY; Wu CT; Numan H; Kuo FC; Wang JW; Lee MS
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Feb; 36(2):682-687. PubMed ID: 32943318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty.
Winter E; Piert M; Volkmann R; Maurer F; Eingartner C; Weise K; Weller S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Jun; 83(6):862-7. PubMed ID: 11407794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The midterm and long-term effects of acetabular roof ring and Burch-Schneider anti-protusio cages in acetabular revisions for patients with acetabular bone deficiency.
Demir MT; Pirinççi Y; Salih M; Erdoğan F; Güney N
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 26511685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].
Gallo J; Rozkydal Z; Sklenský M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Jun; 73(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16846560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acetabular revision. The role of rings and cages.
Schatzker J; Wong MK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Dec; (369):187-97. PubMed ID: 10611874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intermediate-term results with a modified antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery.
Crockarell JR
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Sep; 38(9):E144-8. PubMed ID: 19911104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note.
Bal BS; Maurer T; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1703-6. PubMed ID: 10608381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The modern Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for the treatment of acetabular defects: is it still an option? A systematic review.
Malahias MA; Sarantis M; Gkiatas I; Jang SJ; Gu A; Thorey F; Alexiades MM; Nikolaou VS
Hip Int; 2023 Jul; 33(4):705-715. PubMed ID: 35658595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up.
Shinar AA; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Feb; 79(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 9052535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision.
Zehntner MK; Ganz R
J Arthroplasty; 1994 Oct; 9(5):469-79. PubMed ID: 7807103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cancellous impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.
Patil N; Hwang K; Goodman SB
Orthopedics; 2012 Mar; 35(3):e306-12. PubMed ID: 22385438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.
Uchiyama K; Takahira N; Fukushima K; Yamamoto T; Moriya M; Itoman M
J Orthop Sci; 2010 Nov; 15(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 21116894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years.
Böhm P; Banzhaf S
Acta Orthop Scand; 1999 Jun; 70(3):240-9. PubMed ID: 10429598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up.
Schreurs BW; Thien TM; de Waal Malefijt MC; Buma P; Veth RP; Slooff TJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Apr; 85(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 12672840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
