These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7674178)

  • 1. Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry.
    Derrien G; Le Menn G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 7674178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of measurement site on the dimensional accuracy of die-forming materials and techniques.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Theodotou N; Glaros AG; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 15206253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of the accuracy of three die systems.
    Bloem TJ; Czerniawski B; Luke J; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):758-62. PubMed ID: 2072316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
    Gerrow JD; Price RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of transverse strength and dimensional variations between die stone, die epoxy resin, and die polyurethane resin.
    Derrien G; Sturtz G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 8778379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of frequency and amplitude of vibration on void formation in dies poured from polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Abdullah MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 9791799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing, and epoxy die materials.
    Duke P; Moore BK; Haug SP; Andres CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 10756298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Al-Johani A; Clark RK; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials.
    Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of few physical properties of epoxy resin, resin-modified gypsum and conventional type IV gypsum die materials: an in vitro study.
    Gujjarlapudi MC; Reddy SV; Madineni PK; Ealla KK; Nunna VN; Manne SD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 22430693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of outgassing, tear strength, and detail reproduction in alginate substitute materials.
    Baxter RT; Lawson NC; Cakir D; Beck P; Ramp LC; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 22339382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy resin die material using two setting methods.
    Paquette JM; Taniguchi T; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 10709038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy die material using different polymerization methods.
    Prisco R; Cozzolino G; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 19054302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Purk JH; Willes MG; Tira DE; Eick JD; Hung SH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 9685767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    DeLong R; Pintado MR; Ko CC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 11512112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones.
    Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface detail reproduction of Type IV dental stones with selected polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Schelb E; Cavazos E; Troendle KB; Prihoda TJ
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1784720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.