209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7674189)
1. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
Hanssens JF
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT data and its CAD and CAM utility in implant planning: part I.
Voitik AJ
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):302-3. PubMed ID: 12498541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accurate linear measurements in the anterior maxilla using orthoradially reformatted spiral computed tomography.
Cavalcanti MG; Yang J; Ruprecht A; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 10740466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants placed using an osteotome technique.
Leblebicioglu B; Ersanli S; Karabuda C; Tosun T; Gokdeniz H
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 15857072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic methods for predicting insertion torque of dental implants.
Cortes AR; Eimar H; Barbosa Jde S; Costa C; Arita ES; Tamimi F
J Periodontol; 2015 May; 86(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 25594426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
Lindh C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants.
Petersson A; Lindh C; Carlsson LE
Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 1579883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Russell CM; Sharawy M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants.
Truhlar RS; Orenstein IH; Morris HF; Ochi S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Dec; 55(12 Suppl 5):38-45. PubMed ID: 9393425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique.
Fredholm U; Bolin A; Andersson L
Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8356535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
Benson BW
Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant imaging. Status, controversies, and new developments.
Reiskin AB
Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 9421669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional CT scan analysis for implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Gogarnoiu D; Cavanaugh RR
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Sep; 20(9):855-60, 862, 864 passim; quiz 868. PubMed ID: 10649955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
Gher ME; Richardson AC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
