264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7674406)
1. A comparison of reamed and unreamed nailing of the tibia.
Anglen JO; Blue JM
J Trauma; 1995 Aug; 39(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7674406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should insertion of intramedullary nails for tibial fractures be with or without reaming? A prospective, randomized study with 3.8 years' follow-up.
Larsen LB; Madsen JE; Høiness PR; Øvre S
J Orthop Trauma; 2004 Mar; 18(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 15091267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.
; Bhandari M; Guyatt G; Tornetta P; Schemitsch EH; Swiontkowski M; Sanders D; Walter SD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 90(12):2567-78. PubMed ID: 19047701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults.
Duan X; Al-Qwbani M; Zeng Y; Zhang W; Xiang Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jan; 1():CD008241. PubMed ID: 22258982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective randomized study of reamed versus unreamed femoral intramedullary nailing: an assessment of procedures.
Shepherd LE; Shean CJ; Gelalis ID; Lee J; Carter VS
J Orthop Trauma; 2001 Jan; 15(1):28-32; discussion 32-3. PubMed ID: 11147684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of acute reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing on compartment pressure when treating closed tibial shaft fractures: a randomized prospective study.
Nassif JM; Gorczyca JT; Cole JK; Pugh KJ; Pienkowski D
J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Nov; 14(8):554-8. PubMed ID: 11149501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of locked plate osteosynthesis, reamed and unreamed nailing in conventional interlocking technique, and unreamed angle stable nailing in distal tibia fractures.
Hoegel FW; Hoffmann S; Weninger P; Bühren V; Augat P
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Oct; 73(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22710777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A meta-analysis of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of closed tibial fractures.
Xia L; Zhou J; Zhang Y; Mei G; Jin D
Orthopedics; 2014 Apr; 37(4):e332-8. PubMed ID: 24762836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reamed versus minimally reamed nailing: a prospectively randomised study of 100 patients with closed fractures of the tibia.
Gaebler C; McQueen MM; Vécsei V; Court-Brown CM
Injury; 2011 Sep; 42 Suppl 4():S17-21. PubMed ID: 21939798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should the tibia be reamed when nailing?
Forster MC; Bruce AS; Aster AS
Injury; 2005 Mar; 36(3):439-44. PubMed ID: 15710163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exchange reamed nailing for aseptic nonunion of the tibia.
Zelle BA; Gruen GS; Klatt B; Haemmerle MJ; Rosenblum WJ; Prayson MJ
J Trauma; 2004 Nov; 57(5):1053-9. PubMed ID: 15580032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic evaluation of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing in patients with closed and open tibial fractures: results from the study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures (SPRINT).
; Briel M; Sprague S; Heels-Ansdell D; Guyatt G; Bhandari M; Blackhouse G; Sanders D; Schemitsch E; Swiontkowski M; Tornetta P; Walter SD; Goeree R
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 21669369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.
Vallier HA; Cureton BA; Patterson BM
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Dec; 25(12):736-41. PubMed ID: 21904230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary locked nailing in tibial fractures.
Deleanu B; Prejbeanu R; Poenaru D; Vermesan D; Haragus H
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Dec; 24(8):1597-601. PubMed ID: 24384861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exchange reamed intramedullary nailing for delayed union and nonunion of the tibia.
Templeman D; Thomas M; Varecka T; Kyle R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jun; (315):169-75. PubMed ID: 7634665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reamed compared with unreamed nailing of tibial shaft fractures: Does the initial method of nail insertion influence outcome in patients requiring reoperations?
Schemitsch EH; Kumar A; Heels-Ansdell D; Sprague S; Bhandari M; Guyatt G; Sanders DW; Swiontkowski M; Tornetta P; Walter S;
Can J Surg; 2023; 66(4):E384-E389. PubMed ID: 37442585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft.
Finkemeier CG; Schmidt AH; Kyle RF; Templeman DC; Varecka TF
J Orthop Trauma; 2000; 14(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10791670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The treatment of closed, unstable tibial shaft fractures with unreamed interlocking nails.
Gregory P; Sanders R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jun; (315):48-55. PubMed ID: 7634685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review shows lowered risk of nonunion after reamed nailing in patients with closed tibial shaft fractures.
Lam SW; Teraa M; Leenen LP; van der Heijden GJ
Injury; 2010 Jul; 41(7):671-5. PubMed ID: 20226459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Intramedullary fixation of humerus shaft fractures. An analysis of complications of 2 implants with special reference to outcome after management with the unreamed humerus interlocking nail].
Vécsei N; Kolonja A; Mousavi M; Vécsei V
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Aug; 113(15-16):597-604. PubMed ID: 11571838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
