261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7674501)
1. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies.
Lindfors KK; Rosenquist CJ
JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7674501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness study.
Lindfors KK; McGahan MC; Rosenquist CJ; Hurlock GS
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):710-7. PubMed ID: 16569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening mammography in women aged 40-49 years: analysis of cost-effectiveness.
Rosenquist CJ; Lindfors KK
Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):647-50. PubMed ID: 8184041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age.
Salzmann P; Kerlikowske K; Phillips K
Ann Intern Med; 1997 Dec; 127(11):955-65. PubMed ID: 9412300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
Shen Y; Parmigiani G
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40-49 years.
Ohnuki K; Kuriyama S; Shoji N; Nishino Y; Tsuji I; Ohuchi N
Cancer Sci; 2006 Nov; 97(11):1242-7. PubMed ID: 16918992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening mammography beginning at age 40 years: a reappraisal of cost-effectiveness.
Rosenquist CJ; Lindfors KK
Cancer; 1998 Jun; 82(11):2235-40. PubMed ID: 9610704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
Trentham-Dietz A; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Schechter CB; Ergun MA; van den Broek JJ; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; van Ravesteyn NT; Near AM; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Chandler Y; de Koning HJ; Mandelblatt JS; Tosteson AN;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 165(10):700-712. PubMed ID: 27548583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Program-specific cost-effectiveness analysis: breast cancer screening policies for a safety-net program.
Melnikow J; Tancredi DJ; Yang Z; Ritley D; Jiang Y; Slee C; Popova S; Rylett P; Knutson K; Smalley S
Value Health; 2013; 16(6):932-41. PubMed ID: 24041343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic versus organised mammography screening in Switzerland.
de Gelder R; Bulliard JL; de Wolf C; Fracheboud J; Draisma G; Schopper D; de Koning HJ
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 19038540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.
Neeser K; Szucs T; Bulliard JL; Bachmann G; Schramm W
Value Health; 2007; 10(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17261115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Updated Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Average-Risk Women.
Tina Shih YC; Dong W; Xu Y; Shen Y
Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 30711063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.
Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes of modelling mammography screening strategies.
Yaffe MJ; Mittmann N; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Stout NK
Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):9-15. PubMed ID: 26676234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
