These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7674661)

  • 1. Comparing recognition of distorted speech using an equivalent signal-to-noise ratio index.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Jun; 38(3):706-13. PubMed ID: 7674661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Oct; 38(5):1150-6. PubMed ID: 8558883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1276-85. PubMed ID: 8114494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 6747116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of reverberation and noise on speech recognition by adults with various amounts of sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Harris RW; Swenson DW
    Audiology; 1990; 29(6):314-21. PubMed ID: 2275646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS; Wilber LA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 2314073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical validation of the Russian Matrix test - effect of hearing loss, age, and noise level.
    Warzybok A; Zhilinskaya E; Goykhburg M; Tavartkiladze G; Kollmeier B; Boboshko M
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 59(12):930-940. PubMed ID: 32815756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noise-masked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment.
    Hargus SE; Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 7731214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 40(2):423-31. PubMed ID: 9130210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection and recognition of stop consonants by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Fabry DA; Barrett S; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):942-9. PubMed ID: 1405550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing.
    Eisenberg LS; Dirks DD; Bell TS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):222-33. PubMed ID: 7731213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits of amplification for speech recognition in background noise.
    Turner CW; Henry BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 12398472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relations among temporal acuity, hearing loss, and the perception of speech distorted by noise and reverberation.
    Irwin RJ; McAuley SF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 May; 81(5):1557-65. PubMed ID: 3584693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.