134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7675376)
1. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labor at term.
Varaklis K; Gumina R; Stubblefield PG
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 86(4 Pt 1):541-4. PubMed ID: 7675376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Jones MM; Rahall A; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oral misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term.
Nagpal MB; Raghunandan C; Saili A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 106(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 19375704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison.
Chuck FJ; Huffaker BJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 7485307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor induction at term pregnancies.
Górnisiewicz T; Jaworowski A; Zembala-Szczerba M; Babczyk D; Huras H
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(6):320-324. PubMed ID: 28727132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in patients with an unfavourable cervix.
Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Aiewsakul P
J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 Mar; 80(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9175387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Induction of labor utilizing vaginal vs. intracervical prostaglandin E2.
Seeras RC
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1995 Feb; 48(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 7789590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?
Kolderup L; McLean L; Grullon K; Safford K; Kilpatrick SJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1543-50. PubMed ID: 10368502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
Gherman RB; Browning J; O'Boyle A; Goodwin TM
J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
