These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7675617)

  • 1. Does motion perception follow Weber's law?
    Zanker JM
    Perception; 1995; 24(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 7675617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weber's law in tactile grasping and manual estimation: feedback-dependent evidence for functionally distinct processing streams.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():32-41. PubMed ID: 24556320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher order motion extraction.
    Zanker JM
    Vision Res; 1993 Mar; 33(4):553-69. PubMed ID: 8503201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neural basis for violations of Weber's law in self-motion perception.
    Carriot J; Cullen KE; Chacron MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(36):. PubMed ID: 34475203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantic grasping escapes Weber's law.
    Löwenkamp C; Gärtner W; Haus ID; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():235-45. PubMed ID: 25731904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hand anthropometry and the limits of aperture separation determine the utility of Weber's law in grasping and manual estimation.
    Ayala N; Binsted G; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2439-2446. PubMed ID: 29923096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical constraints do not influence pantomime-grasping adherence to Weber's law: A reply to Utz et al. (2015).
    Manzone J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Whitwell RL; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():31-35. PubMed ID: 27876512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns.
    De Bruyn B; Orban GA
    Vision Res; 1988; 28(12):1323-35. PubMed ID: 3256150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction of first- and second-order direction in motion-defined motion.
    Zanker JM; Burns NR
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Sep; 18(9):2321-30. PubMed ID: 11551066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manual estimations of functionally graspable target objects adhere to Weber's law.
    Heath M; Manzone J
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 28280878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visually and memory-guided grasping: aperture shaping exhibits a time-dependent scaling to Weber's law.
    Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1941-8. PubMed ID: 21777599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fechner's elusive parallel law.
    Ross HE; Wade NJ
    Seeing Perceiving; 2010; 23(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 21466147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motion capture depends on signal strength.
    Festa-Martino E; Welch L
    Perception; 2001; 30(4):489-510. PubMed ID: 11383194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A temporal basis for Weber's law in value perception.
    Namboodiri VM; Mihalas S; Hussain Shuler MG
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2014; 8():79. PubMed ID: 25352791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
    Ozana A; Ganel T
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND.
    Bhatia K; Löwenkamp C; Franz VH
    J Vis; 2022 Nov; 22(12):13. PubMed ID: 36374493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual limits of common fate.
    Stürzel F; Spillmann L
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(13):1565-73. PubMed ID: 15126065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical factors may explain why grasping violates Weber's law.
    Utz KS; Hesse C; Aschenneller N; Schenk T
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):22-30. PubMed ID: 25872174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of moving local density differences in dynamic random patterns by human observers.
    Casco C; Morgan M
    Perception; 1987; 16(6):711-7. PubMed ID: 3454429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of suprathreshold amplitude modulation and intensity increments: Weber's law revisited.
    Wojtczak M; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2220-36. PubMed ID: 18397028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.