These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7676360)

  • 1. [A simple technique for quality improvement of breast specimen radiography].
    Meindl S; Glöcker M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Jul; 48(7):214-6. PubMed ID: 7676360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Film-screen combinations in mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Z Lymphol; 1983 Dec; 7(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 6673399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The stationary grid in mammography: its clinical evaluation].
    Draghi F; Ferrozzi G; Ferrozzi F; Ferranti C
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 8480057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Detection of microcalcifications by mammography with intensifying screens].
    Gurvic AM; Katomina RW; Petrowa JJu ; Rozkova NJ; Angerstein W; Wolf M
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1983; 24(3):409-18. PubMed ID: 6611911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
    Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
    Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical trial of mammography with film-screen-combinations. Part 1: Selection of a suitable film-screen system].
    Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rontgenpraxis; 1981; 34(11):458-66. PubMed ID: 7313855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.
    Smith A
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting film-screen mammographic image quality.
    Mathis JH
    J Clin Eng; 1995; 20(5):376-87. PubMed ID: 10152444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comments on the article "Focus measurement and geometric lack of focus in mammography equipment"].
    Andersson O
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Nov; 4(6):351-2. PubMed ID: 7819303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Sickles EA
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():52-7. PubMed ID: 3589132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
    Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography using an ultrahigh-strip-density, stationary, focused grid.
    Dershaw DD; Masterson ME; Malik S; Cruz NM
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):541-4. PubMed ID: 4011922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recent trends in screen-film mammography: technical factors and radiation dose.
    Haus AG
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():37-51. PubMed ID: 3296054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluating the diagnostic quality of mammography film-screen systems: a comparative study].
    Nüssle K; Görich J; Rieber A; Brambs HJ
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):178-81. PubMed ID: 10574026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Capacities of digital mammography in screening].
    Belotserkovtseva LD; Klimova NV; Samatova TB; Agapova NA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2008; (4-6):33-6. PubMed ID: 21337748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital imaging in the surgical detection of breast neoplasms].
    Rulli A; Cirocchi R; Carli L; Cagini L
    G Chir; 1993 Dec; 14(9):483-7. PubMed ID: 8167081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Digital full field mammography: physical principles and clinical aspects].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):171-7. PubMed ID: 10574025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.