BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7676422)

  • 1. [Can we rely on Norwegian surgery data? A quality control at central and local hospitals of the procedure codes used in the survey on organization of gastrointestinal cancer surgery].
    Kindseth O; Ostensen H; Soreide O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Aug; 115(20):2555-8. PubMed ID: 7676422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Validity of the registration and reporting of vaginal prolapse surgery].
    Ottesen M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Feb; 171(6):404-8. PubMed ID: 19208327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of data reported on abdominal aortic aneurysm repair--a comparison between a national vascular and a national administrative registry.
    Haug ES; Romundstad P; Saether OD; Jørgenvåg R; Myhre HO
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 29(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 15878531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data quality of surgery for carotid artery stenosis. Are the national vascular registries reliable?
    Dahl T; Rudjord K; Altreuther M; Myhre HO
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 31(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 16387520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validity.
    Lofthus CM; Cappelen I; Osnes EK; Falch JA; Kristiansen IS; Medhus AW; Nordsletten L; Meyer HE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 15718117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery.
    Gunnarsson U; Seligsohn E; Jestin P; Påhlman L
    Br J Surg; 2003 Apr; 90(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 12673748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for children's hospitals.
    Sedman A; Harris JM; Schulz K; Schwalenstocker E; Remus D; Scanlon M; Bahl V
    Pediatrics; 2005 Jan; 115(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 15579669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data.
    Henderson T; Shepheard J; Sundararajan V
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11):1011-9. PubMed ID: 17063133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From DRG databases to an epidemiological observatory for colorectal cancer in a French small area oncology network.
    Paviot BT; Martin C; Clavel L; De Laroche G; Rodrigues JM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():829-33. PubMed ID: 14664091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Expenditure and reliability of ICD/ICPM-coding in routine surgery].
    Stinner B; Nies C; Celik I; Berghöfer P; Rothmund M
    Gesundheitswesen; 1999 Feb; 61(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 10226394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations.
    Gjertsen JE; Engesaeter LB; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Steindal K; Vinje T; Fevang JM
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Oct; 79(5):583-93. PubMed ID: 18839363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The validity of data in registration of operations. A quality analysis].
    Wille-Jørgensen PA; Meisner S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Dec; 159(49):7328-30. PubMed ID: 9417734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Hysterectomy in Norway. Quality of data and clinical practice].
    Backe B; Lilleeng S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Mar; 113(8):971-4. PubMed ID: 8470080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Use of patient registries in surgery].
    Valen B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Oct; 122(26):2555-7. PubMed ID: 12522885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structured electronic template for histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas: a joint project by the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Society for Pathology.
    Bjugn R; Casati B; Norstein J
    Hum Pathol; 2008 Mar; 39(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 18187180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Head and neck cancer in Norway. A study of the quality of the Cancer Registry of Norway's data on head and neck cancer for the period 1953-1991.
    Mork J; Thoresen S; Faye-Lund H; Langmark F; Glattre E
    APMIS; 1995 May; 103(5):375-82. PubMed ID: 7654362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Curative rectal cancer surgery in a low-volume hospital: a quality assessment.
    Debes AJ; Størkson RH; Jacobsen MB
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Apr; 34(4):382-9. PubMed ID: 17669613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Diagnosis versus code].
    Hoddevik GH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Nov; 125(21):2973-4. PubMed ID: 16276384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Danish Psychiatric Central Register.
    Munk-Jørgensen P; Mortensen PB
    Dan Med Bull; 1997 Feb; 44(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 9062767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nordic gynecologists' opinion on quality assessment registers.
    Dueholm M; Rokkones E; Löfgren M; Härkki P; Arason G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Jun; 83(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15144339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.