These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7676921)

  • 1. Microbiological contamination of reindeer carcass during slaughter.
    Vaarala A; Korkeala H
    Acta Vet Scand; 1994; 35(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 7676921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbiological contamination of reindeer carcasses in different reindeer slaughterhouses.
    Vaarala AM; Korkeala HJ
    J Food Prot; 1999 Feb; 62(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 10030634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and practicability of bacteriological monitoring of beef carcass contamination and their rating within a hygiene quality control programme of abattoirs.
    Untermann F; Stephan R; Dura U; Hofer M; Heimann P
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 34(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 9029256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbiological contamination of cattle carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Capek M; Stephan R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Oct; 98(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 24967539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of shearing and fleece cleanliness on microbiological contamination of lamb carcasses.
    Hauge SJ; Nafstad O; Skjerve E; Røtterud OJ; Nesbakken T
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 150(2-3):178-83. PubMed ID: 21862163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Airborne bacteria and carcass contamination in slaughterhouses.
    Rahkio TM; Korkeala HJ
    J Food Prot; 1997 Jan; 60(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 10465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microbiological monitoring of sheep carcass contamination in three Swiss abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Stephan R
    J Food Prot; 2003 Jun; 66(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 12800993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of bacterial superficial contamination in classical or ritually slaughtered cattle using metagenetics and microbiological analysis.
    Korsak N; Taminiau B; Hupperts C; Delhalle L; Nezer C; Delcenserie V; Daube G
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 247():79-86. PubMed ID: 27756497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence of coagulase positive Staphylococcus on beef carcasses in three Australian abattoirs.
    Desmarchelier PM; Higgs GM; Mills L; Sullivan AM; Vanderlinde PB
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 47(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 10359492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbiological contamination of ovine carcasses associated with the presence of wool and faecal material.
    Biss ME; Hathaway SC
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1996 Dec; 81(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 8972086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of microbial contamination of different pork carcass areas through culture-dependent and independent methods in small-scale slaughterhouses.
    Peruzy MF; Houf K; Joossens M; Yu Z; Proroga YTR; Murru N
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 336():108902. PubMed ID: 33091757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between slaughter practices and the distribution of Salmonella and hygiene indicator bacteria on pig carcasses during slaughter.
    Biasino W; De Zutter L; Mattheus W; Bertrand S; Uyttendaele M; Van Damme I
    Food Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 70():192-199. PubMed ID: 29173627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of swabbing and destructive methods for microbiological pig carcass sampling.
    Ghafir Y; Daube G
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 47(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 19241527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the principal points of product contamination during beef carcass dressing processes in Northern Ireland.
    Madden RH; Murray KA; Gilmour A
    J Food Prot; 2004 Jul; 67(7):1494-6. PubMed ID: 15270508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between hide cleanliness and bacterial numbers on beef carcasses at a commercial abattoir.
    McEvoy JM; Doherty AM; Finnerty M; Sheridan JJ; McGuire L; Blair IS; McDowell DA; Harrington D
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2000 May; 30(5):390-5. PubMed ID: 10792669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aerobic Mesophilic, Coliform,
    Jaja IF; Green E; Muchenje V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29690529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The significance of clean and dirty animals for bacterial dynamics along the beef chain.
    Hauge SJ; Nesbakken T; Moen B; Røtterud OJ; Dommersnes S; Nesteng O; Østensvik Ø; Alvseike O
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 214():70-76. PubMed ID: 26248068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B; Celda MF; Anastasio B; García I; López-Mendoza MC
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.