These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7676980)

  • 1. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
    Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
    Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Forman HP; DiCroce J
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material.
    Brink JA; Heiken JP; Forman HP; Sagel SS; Molina PL; Brown PC
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 7568859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast enhancement for whole-body screening using multidetector row helical CT: comparison between uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
    Awai K; Imuta M; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Shamima S; Kawanaka K; Hori S; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 15553010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
    Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.
    Foley WD; Hoffmann RG; Quiroz FA; Kahn CE; Perret RS
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 8029399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of different threshold levels and injection rates on hepatic enhancement by using bolus tracking technique in helical CT].
    Erdoğan C; Savci G
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 14661491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variation of the time to aortic enhancement of fixed-duration versus fixed-rate injection protocols.
    Kim MJ; Chung YE; Kim KW; Chung JJ; Lim JS; Oh YT; Kim JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 16357400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography.
    Fleischmann D; Rubin GD; Bankier AA; Hittmair K
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):363-71. PubMed ID: 10671582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate?
    Frederick MG; McElaney BL; Singer A; Park KS; Paulson EK; McGee SG; Nelson RC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1305-10. PubMed ID: 8633437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas.
    Bonaldi VM; Bret PM; Atri M; Garcia P; Reinhold C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8659419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peak enhancement of the liver in children using power injection and helical CT.
    Ruess L; Bulas DI; Kushner DC; Silverman PM; Fearon TC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 9490952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic hepatic CT: uniphasic and biphasic contrast medium injection protocols.
    Drop A
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 1999; 54():195-204. PubMed ID: 11205764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hepatic contrast enhancement at CT: influence of intravenous glucagon in a canine model.
    Warshauer DM; Hiken JN; Molina PL; Hackney SL; Bellinger DA; Lee JK
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 7480678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
    Small WC; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME; Brummer LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material.
    Silverman PM; Roberts SC; Ducic I; Tefft MC; Olson MC; Cooper C; Zeman RK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8659426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics.
    Platt JF; Reige KA; Ellis JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9888738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast material flow phantom: feasibility study.
    Awai K; Hatcho A; Nakayama Y; Kusunoki S; Liu D; Hatemura M; Funama Y; Denbo M; Sato N; Yamashita Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 16423942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.