These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1943 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7677674)
1. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Rossiter GP Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division All Engl Law Rep; 1992 Jul; [1992]4():649-70. PubMed ID: 11648226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy. Cahill H Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Brown. Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fifth Division North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Dec; 689():397-406. PubMed ID: 12041238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In re A.C. District of Columbia. Court of Appeals, en banc Atl Report; 1990 Apr; 573():1235-64. PubMed ID: 11648191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion ruling in Quebec. Brahams D Lancet; 1989 Aug; 2(8658):340-1. PubMed ID: 2569146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question. Levine EM Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women. Levy JK J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 11657465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The pregnant woman and the good Samaritan: can a woman have a duty to undergo a caesarean section? Scott R Oxf J Leg Stud; 2000; 20(3):407-36. PubMed ID: 12452142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beyond abortion: refusal of caesarean section. Mahowald M Bioethics; 1989 Apr; 3(2):106-21. PubMed ID: 11649241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority. Georgia. Supreme Court South East Report Second Ser; 1981 Feb; 274():457-62. PubMed ID: 12041308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The concept of wrongful life in the law. Kasper AS Women Health; 1983; 8(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 6868627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-consensual sterilization of the adult with learning disabilities. Knifton C Br J Nurs; 1998 Oct 22-Nov 11; 7(19):1172-6. PubMed ID: 9866467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent developments in abortion law in industrialized countries. Boland R Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(4):404-18. PubMed ID: 2089193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Refusal of emergency caesarean section in Ireland: a relational approach. Wade K Med Law Rev; 2014; 22(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 24255134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means? Drigotas EE North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]