These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7678386)

  • 1. The spatial location of EEG electrodes: locating the best-fitting sphere relative to cortical anatomy.
    Towle VL; Bolaños J; Suarez D; Tan K; Grzeszczuk R; Levin DN; Cakmur R; Frank SA; Spire JP
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Jan; 86(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7678386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of 10-20 system electrode locations using magnetic resonance image scanning with markers.
    Lagerlund TD; Sharbrough FW; Jack CR; Erickson BJ; Strelow DC; Cicora KM; Busacker NE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Jan; 86(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 7678393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generic head models for atlas-based EEG source analysis.
    Darvas F; Ermer JJ; Mosher JC; Leahy RM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 Feb; 27(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 16037984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Algorithm to find high density EEG scalp coordinates and analysis of their correspondence to structural and functional regions of the brain.
    Giacometti P; Perdue KL; Diamond SG
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 229():84-96. PubMed ID: 24769168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial mislocalization of EEG electrodes -- effects on accuracy of dipole estimation.
    Khosla D; Don M; Kwong B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Feb; 110(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 10210615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model.
    Wang Y; Gotman J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1777-80. PubMed ID: 11514261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simplified projection of EEG dipole sources onto human brain anatomy.
    Merlet I; García-Larrea L; Froment JC; Mauguière F
    Neurophysiol Clin; 1999 Feb; 29(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 10093817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability of electrode positions using electrode caps.
    Atcherson SR; Gould HJ; Pousson MA; Prout TM
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 17929157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Algorithmic localization of high-density EEG electrode positions using motion capture.
    Hirth LN; Stanley CJ; Damiano DL; Bulea TC
    J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Dec; 346():108919. PubMed ID: 32853593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial localization of EEG electrodes using 3D scanning.
    Taberna GA; Marino M; Ganzetti M; Mantini D
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026020. PubMed ID: 30634182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Co-registration of EEG and MRI data using matching of spline interpolated and MRI-segmented reconstructions of the scalp surface.
    Lamm C; Windischberger C; Leodolter U; Moser E; Bauer H
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 11797814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated detection and labeling of high-density EEG electrodes from structural MR images.
    Marino M; Liu Q; Brem S; Wenderoth N; Mantini D
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056003. PubMed ID: 27484621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Head surface digitization and registration: a method for mapping positions on the head onto magnetic resonance images.
    Wang B; Toro C; Zeffiro TA; Hallett M
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 6(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 8204405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scalp-recorded EEG localization in MRI volume data.
    Brinkmann BH; O'Brien TJ; Dresner MA; Lagerlund TD; Sharbrough FW; Robb RA
    Brain Topogr; 1998; 10(4):245-53. PubMed ID: 9672223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain-computer interfaces using capacitive measurement of visual or auditory steady-state responses.
    Baek HJ; Kim HS; Heo J; Lim YG; Park KS
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Apr; 10(2):024001. PubMed ID: 23448913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single camera photogrammetry system for EEG electrode identification and localization.
    Baysal U; Sengül G
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1539-47. PubMed ID: 20186487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous 3-T fMRI and high-density recording of human auditory evoked potentials.
    Scarff CJ; Reynolds A; Goodyear BG; Ponton CW; Dort JC; Eggermont JJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):1129-42. PubMed ID: 15528112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of DFT and lock-in amplifier features and search for optimal electrode positions in SSVEP-based BCI.
    Müller-Putz GR; Eder E; Wriessnegger SC; Pfurtscheller G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Feb; 168(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 17980917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recursive grid partitioning on a cortical surface model: an optimized technique for the localization of implanted subdural electrodes.
    Pieters TA; Conner CR; Tandon N
    J Neurosurg; 2013 May; 118(5):1086-97. PubMed ID: 23495883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 7681385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.