These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7678386)

  • 21. More Reliable EEG Electrode Digitizing Methods Can Reduce Source Estimation Uncertainty, but Current Methods Already Accurately Identify Brodmann Areas.
    Shirazi SY; Huang HJ
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1159. PubMed ID: 31787866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Localizing ECoG electrodes on the cortical anatomy without post-implantation imaging.
    Gupta D; Hill NJ; Adamo MA; Ritaccio A; Schalk G
    Neuroimage Clin; 2014; 6():64-76. PubMed ID: 25379417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using a structured-light 3D scanner to improve EEG source modeling with more accurate electrode positions.
    Homölle S; Oostenveld R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Oct; 326():108378. PubMed ID: 31376413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gender differences in source location for the N100 auditory evoked magnetic field.
    Baumann SB; Rogers RL; Guinto FC; Saydjari CL; Papanicolaou AC; Eisenberg HM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 1703950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Locating VEP equivalent dipoles in magnetic resonance images.
    Towle VL; Cakmur R; Cao Y; Brigell M; Parmeggiani L
    Int J Neurosci; 1995; 80(1-4):105-16. PubMed ID: 7775043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical utility of current-generation dipole modelling of scalp EEG.
    Plummer C; Litewka L; Farish S; Harvey AS; Cook MJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 118(11):2344-61. PubMed ID: 17889598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. General bounds for electrode mislocation on the EEG inverse problem.
    Beltrachini L; von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20599288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Automated cortical projection of EEG sensors: anatomical correlation via the international 10-10 system.
    Koessler L; Maillard L; Benhadid A; Vignal JP; Felblinger J; Vespignani H; Braun M
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 19233295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship Between EEG Electrode and Functional Cortex in the International 10 to 20 System.
    Ives-Deliperi VL; Butler JT
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Nov; 35(6):504-509. PubMed ID: 30387785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. EEG scalp electrode projection onto three-dimensional surface rendered images of the brain.
    Jack CR; Marsh WR; Hirschorn KA; Sharbrough FW; Cascino GD; Karwoski RA; Robb RA
    Radiology; 1990 Aug; 176(2):413-8. PubMed ID: 2367656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The detection of an evoked potential to a single stimulus--a method for spatial synchronous averaging].
    Gnezditskiĭ VV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1990; 16(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 2210129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of electrode density and measurement noise on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution.
    Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Laarne PH; Malmivuo JA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1547-54. PubMed ID: 15376503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Compliant head probe for positioning electroencephalography electrodes and near-infrared spectroscopy optodes.
    Giacometti P; Diamond SG
    J Biomed Opt; 2013 Feb; 18(2):27005. PubMed ID: 23377012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The reorganization of the spatial EEG correlation evoked by visual stimulation].
    Kropotkov IuD; Ponomarev VA; Ferri R
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1999; 25(3):25-33. PubMed ID: 10822621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The standardized EEG electrode array of the IFCN.
    Seeck M; Koessler L; Bast T; Leijten F; Michel C; Baumgartner C; He B; Beniczky S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 128(10):2070-2077. PubMed ID: 28778476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Preliminary Study on Precision Image Guidance for Electrode Placement in an EEG Study.
    Jeon S; Chien J; Song C; Hong J
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Mar; 31(2):174-185. PubMed ID: 29204789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Augmented reality-based electrode guidance system for reliable electroencephalography.
    Song C; Jeon S; Lee S; Ha HG; Kim J; Hong J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 May; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 29793498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A practical method for determining electrode positions on the head.
    De Munck JC; Vijn PC; Spekreijse H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Jan; 78(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 1701720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Whole head measurement of auditory evoked magnetic field using a MR-linked helmet shaped MEG system].
    Nakasato N; Seki K; Kawamura T; Fujita S; Matani A; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1994 Jul; 46(7):632-7. PubMed ID: 7946618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.