These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7678391)

  • 1. The influence of stimulus intensity, contralateral masking and handedness on the temporal N1 and the T complex components of the auditory N1 wave.
    Connolly JF
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Jan; 86(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 7678391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of stimulus intensity, contralateral masking and handedness on the temporal N1 and the T complex components of the auditory N1 wave, by John F. Connolly.
    Wolpaw JR; Cacace AT
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jul; 91(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7517847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: the T-complex.
    Tonnquist-Uhlen I; Ponton CW; Eggermont JJ; Kwong B; Don M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Apr; 114(4):685-701. PubMed ID: 12686277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetry of temporal auditory T-complex: right ear-left hemisphere advantage in Tb timing in children.
    Bruneau N; Bidet-Caulet A; Roux S; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Gomot M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Feb; 95(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 25093904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suppression of the P(b) (P(1)) component of the auditory middle latency response with contralateral masking.
    Özdamar Ö; Bohórquez J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Aug; 119(8):1870-1880. PubMed ID: 18467167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A temporal component of the auditory evoked response.
    Wolpaw JR; Penry JK
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Dec; 39(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 53139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
    Hine J; Debener S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory brainstem responses: masking related changes in wave VI.
    Reid A; Birchall JP; Moffat DA
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Feb; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6722368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. T complex hemispheric asymmetries: effects of stimulus intensity.
    Cacace AT; Dowman R; Wolpaw JR
    Hear Res; 1988 Aug; 34(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 3170365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of auditory evoked potentials of one's own voice.
    Gunji A; Hoshiyama M; Kakigi R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Feb; 111(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 10680556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intensity-amplitude relationships in monkey event-related potentials: parallels to human augmenting-reducing responses.
    Pineda JA; Holmes TC; Foote SL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Jun; 78(6):456-65. PubMed ID: 1712281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human auditory middle latency responses: influence of stimulus type and intensity.
    Borgmann C; Ross B; Draganova R; Pantev C
    Hear Res; 2001 Aug; 158(1-2):57-64. PubMed ID: 11506937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathway and hemispheric differences in the event-related potential (ERP) to monaural stimulation: a comparison of schizophrenic patients with normal controls.
    Connolly JF; Manchanda R; Gruzelier JH; Hirsch SR
    Biol Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 20(3):293-303. PubMed ID: 3978164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory brain stem response in newborn infants--masking effect on ipsi- and contralateral recording.
    Hatanaka T; Yasuhara A; Hori A; Kobayashi Y
    Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 2358135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of auditory attention measured from human electrocorticograms.
    Neelon MF; Williams J; Garell PC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):504-21. PubMed ID: 16458596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P300 in young and elderly subjects: auditory frequency and intensity effects.
    Vesco KK; Bone RC; Ryan JC; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 7688285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical auditory evoked potential in aging: effects of stimulus intensity and noise.
    Kim JR; Ahn SY; Jeong SW; Kim LS; Park JS; Chung SH; Oh MK
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1105-12. PubMed ID: 22892802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.