These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7680994)

  • 21. Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.
    Indahlastari A; Chauhan M; Sadleir RJ
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026019. PubMed ID: 30605892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computational modeling of epidural cortical stimulation.
    Wongsarnpigoon A; Grill WM
    J Neural Eng; 2008 Dec; 5(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 19015584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Woods AJ; Bryant V; Sacchetti D; Gervits F; Hamilton R
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 25583653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visualization of the electric field evoked by transcranial electric stimulation during a craniotomy using the finite element method.
    Tomio R; Akiyama T; Horikoshi T; Ohira T; Yoshida K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Dec; 256():157-67. PubMed ID: 26391774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A modelling study to inform specification and optimal electrode placement for imaging of neuronal depolarization during visual evoked responses by electrical and magnetic detection impedance tomography.
    Gilad O; Horesh L; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S201-24. PubMed ID: 19491442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cortical evoked responses following esophageal balloon distension and electrical stimulation in healthy volunteers.
    Hollerbach S; Hudoba P; Fitzpatrick D; Hunt R; Upton AR; Tougas G
    Dig Dis Sci; 1998 Nov; 43(11):2558-66. PubMed ID: 9824150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Verification of the finite element method to model subthreshold electrical current density in saline.
    Waugaman WA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1999; 35():367-72. PubMed ID: 11143379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cortical imaging on a head template: a simulation study using a resistor mesh model (RMM).
    Chauveau N; Franceries X; Aubry F; Celsis P; Rigaud B
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18629625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the shock artifacts induced by tripolar and bipolar electrical stimulation techniques.
    Wee AS; Jiles K; Brennan R
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2001; 41(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 11402507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation.
    Holdefer RN; Sadleir R; Russell MJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1388-97. PubMed ID: 16644273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The computational study of subdural cortical stimulation: a quantitative analysis of voltage and current stimulation.
    Kim D; Seo H; Kim HI; Jun SC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():867-70. PubMed ID: 23366030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation?
    Lee M; Kim YH; Im CH; Kim JH; Park CH; Chang WH; Lee A
    Neurosci Lett; 2015 Jan; 584():347-50. PubMed ID: 25450146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation.
    Manoli Z; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Samaras T
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):262-271. PubMed ID: 28044315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental study of the course of threshold current, voltage and electrode impedance during stepwise stimulation from the skin surface to the human cortex.
    Szelényi A; Journée HL; Herrlich S; Galistu GM; van den Berg J; van Dijk JM
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 23137703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Thielscher A; Opitz A; Windhoff M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 20682353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation.
    Butson CR; Maks CB; McIntyre CC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 16376143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of cephalic and extracephalic montages for transcranial direct current stimulation--a numerical study.
    Noetscher GM; Yanamadala J; Makarov SN; Pascual-Leone A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Sep; 61(9):2488-98. PubMed ID: 25014947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold.
    Lee WH; Lisanby SH; Laine AF; Peterchev AV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Sep; 62(9):2095-105. PubMed ID: 25910001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.
    Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Salinari S; Babiloni C; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Ding L; Ni Y; He B; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1457-70. PubMed ID: 15707795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
    Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.