172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7681385)
1. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells.
Zhang Z; Jewett DL
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 7681385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time-points.
Zhang Z; Jewett DL; Goodwill G
Brain Topogr; 1994; 6(4):283-98. PubMed ID: 7946928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Model misspecification detection by means of multiple generator errors, using the observed potential map.
Zhang Z; Jewett DL
Brain Topogr; 1994; 7(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 7803197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.
Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé M; Lemahieu I; Boon P
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):528-34. PubMed ID: 11094809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Location of electric current sources in the human brain estimated by the dipole tracing method of the scalp-skull-brain (SSB) head model.
Homma S; Musha T; Nakajima Y; Okamoto Y; Blom S; Flink R; Hagbarth KE; Moström U
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 91(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 7525234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple-generator errors are unavoidable under model misspecification.
Jewett DL; Zhang Z
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Aug; 95(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 7649005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models.
Berg P; Scherg M
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jan; 90(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 7509274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of model parameters on the inverse solution based on MEGs and EEGs.
Peters MJ; De Munck JC
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():61-8; discussion 69. PubMed ID: 1814156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model.
Wang Y; Gotman J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1777-80. PubMed ID: 11514261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull.
Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Malmivuo JA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1851-8. PubMed ID: 16941841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial mislocalization of EEG electrodes -- effects on accuracy of dipole estimation.
Khosla D; Don M; Kwong B
Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Feb; 110(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 10210615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An equivalent current source model and laplacian weighted minimum norm current estimates of brain electrical activity.
He B; Yao D; Lian J; Wu D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 11942719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of EEG electrode density on dipole localization accuracy using two realistically shaped skull resistivity models.
Laarne PH; Tenhunen-Eskelinen ML; Hyttinen JK; Eskola HJ
Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 10912732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EEG dipole source localization using artificial neural networks.
Van Hoey G; De Clercq J; Vanrumste B; Van De Walle R; Lemahieu I; D'Havé M; Boon P
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):997-1011. PubMed ID: 10795987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
