These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds. Maiste AC; Wiens AS; Hunt MJ; Scherg M; Picton TW Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):68-90. PubMed ID: 7774771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological and phonological change detection measures of auditory word processing in normal Persian-speaking children. Ziatabar Ahmadi SZ; Mahmoudian S; Ashayeri H; Allaeddini F; Farhadi M Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 90():220-226. PubMed ID: 27729137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mismatch negativity to acoustic differences not differentiated behaviorally. Dalebout SD; Stack JW J Am Acad Audiol; 1999; 10(7):388-99. PubMed ID: 10949943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploration of the perceptual magnet effect using the mismatch negativity auditory evoked potential. Sharma A; Dorman MF J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):511-7. PubMed ID: 9670542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. No effect of gender on tonal and phonetic mismatch negativity in normal adults assessed by a high-resolution EEG recording. Kasai K; Nakagome K; Iwanami A; Fukuda M; Itoh K; Koshida I; Kato N Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 May; 13(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 11918996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in sensory processing of German vowels and physically matched non-speech sounds as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the human event-related brain potential (ERP). Christmann CA; Berti S; Steinbrink C; Lachmann T Brain Lang; 2014 Sep; 136():8-18. PubMed ID: 25108306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atypical central auditory speech-sound discrimination in children who stutter as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Jansson-Verkasalo E; Eggers K; Järvenpää A; Suominen K; Van den Bergh B; De Nil L; Kujala T J Fluency Disord; 2014 Sep; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 25066139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A paradigm to measure mismatch negativity responses to phonetic and acoustic changes in parallel. Takegata R; Mariotto Roggia S; Näätänen R Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 12811004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The processing of speech and non-speech sounds in aphasic patients as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Ilvonen T; Kujala T; Kozou H; Kiesiläinen A; Salonen O; Alku P; Näätänen R Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 15288425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural discrimination of speech sound changes in a variable context occurs irrespective of attention and explicit awareness. Virtala P; Partanen E; Tervaniemi M; Kujala T Biol Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132():217-227. PubMed ID: 29305875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Processing of English words with fine acoustic contrasts and simple tones: a mismatch negativity study. Pettigrew CM; Murdoch BM; Kei J; Chenery HJ; Sockalingam R; Ponton CW; Finnigan S; Alku P J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 15030101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]