215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7681852)
1. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head-to-head evaluation of five chlamydia tests relative to a quality-assured culture standard.
Newhall WJ; Johnson RE; DeLisle S; Fine D; Hadgu A; Matsuda B; Osmond D; Campbell J; Stamm WE
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 37(3):681-5. PubMed ID: 9986831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Magder LS; Klontz KC; Bush LH; Barnes RC
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Apr; 28(4):781-4. PubMed ID: 2185264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.
Lefebvre J; Laperrière H; Rousseau H; Massé R
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 26(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 3284899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confirmation of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay for chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test.
Beebe JL; Masters H; Jungkind D; Heltzel DM; Weinberg A
Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8946630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA for diagnosis of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.
Chan SW
Pathology; 1993 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 8316503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 and the Microtrak enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital samples.
Stary A; Teodorowicz L; Hörting-Müller I; Nerad S; Storch M
Sex Transm Dis; 1994; 21(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 8140485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a nonisotopic probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.
Woods GL; Young A; Scott JC; Blair TM; Johnson AM
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):370-2. PubMed ID: 2179265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Warren R; Dwyer B; Plackett M; Pettit K; Rizvi N; Baker AM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jun; 31(6):1663-6. PubMed ID: 8315015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Syva's enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
Moncada J; Schachter J; Bolan G; Nathan J; Shafer MA; Clark A; Schwebke J; Stamm W; Mroczkowski T; Seliborska Z
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 1478048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.
Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF
Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 1-year evaluation of Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay with selective confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay in a high-volume laboratory.
Chan EL; Brandt K; Horsman GB
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2208-11. PubMed ID: 7814548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Confirmatory testing of Chlamydia trachomatis Syva enzyme immunoassay gray zone specimens by Syva direct fluorescent antibody test.
Beebe JL; Rau MP; Albrecht KD
Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(3):140-2. PubMed ID: 8511707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enzyme immunoassay and direct immunofluorescence for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen in male first-void urine.
Domeika MA; Bassiri M; Mårdh PA
Acta Derm Venereol; 1994 Jul; 74(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 7976101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Bäckman M; Rudén AK; Ringertz O; Sanström EG
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Sep; 8(9):778-82. PubMed ID: 2480238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection by Chlamydiazyme combined with Chlamydia Blocking Reagent verification.
Zeeberg B; Thelin I; Schalén C
Int J STD AIDS; 1992; 3(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 1391063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 system, direct fluorescent-antibody, and cell culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical specimens.
Iwen PC; Blair TM; Woods GL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Apr; 95(4):578-82. PubMed ID: 2014785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Use of transcription-based amplification and enzyme immunoassay methods to investigate possible Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women with genital complaints].
Bulut Y; Durmaz B; Durmaz R; Otlu B
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2002 Jan; 36(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 12476764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
