These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7686474)

  • 1. P3 varies with stimulus categorization rather than probability.
    Mecklinger A; Ullsperger P
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Jun; 86(6):395-407. PubMed ID: 7686474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. P300 from a single auditory stimulus.
    Polich J; Eischen SE; Collins GE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 92(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 7514994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: probability and inter-stimulus interval.
    Polich J; Brock T; Geisler MW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1991 Aug; 11(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 1748598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probability and inter-stimulus interval effects on the P300 from auditory stimuli.
    Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Dec; 10(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 2272863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3.
    Gaeta H; Friedman D; Hunt G
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Mar; 40(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 12820861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P300 in young and elderly subjects: auditory frequency and intensity effects.
    Vesco KK; Bone RC; Ryan JC; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 7688285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERPs to stimuli requiring response production and inhibition: effects of age, probability and visual noise.
    Pfefferbaum A; Ford JM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 2446846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of tone stimulus frequency on late positive component activity (P3) among normal elderly subjects.
    Pollock VE; Schneider LS
    Int J Neurosci; 1989 Mar; 45(1-2):127-32. PubMed ID: 2714938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of covert attention and stimulus complexity on the P3 response during an auditory continuous performance task.
    Shucard DW; Abara JP; McCabe DC; Benedict RB; Shucard JL
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Nov; 54(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 15331213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. P3 amplitude and time-on-task effects in distractible adolescents.
    Määttä S; Herrgård E; Saavalainen P; Pääkkönen A; Könönen M; Luoma L; Laukkanen E; Yppärilä H; Partanen J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2175-83. PubMed ID: 16055376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Target-to-target interval versus probability effects on P300 in one- and two-tone tasks.
    Croft RJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Gabriel C; Barry RJ
    Psychophysiology; 2003 May; 40(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 12946107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Smith JL; Clarke AR; Croft RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parametric manipulations of auditory stimuli differentially affect P3 amplitude in schizophrenics and controls.
    Salisbury DF; O'Donnell BF; McCarley RW; Nestor PG; Faux SF; Smith RS
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Jan; 31(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 8146252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory event-related potentials in humans and rats: effects of task manipulation.
    Sambeth A; Maes JH; Van Luijtelaar G; Molenkamp IB; Jongsma ML; Van Rijn CM
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Jan; 40(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 12751804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related brain potentials in children with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder: effects of stimulus deviancy and task relevance in the visual and auditory modality.
    Kemner C; Verbaten MN; Koelega HS; Buitelaar JK; van der Gaag RJ; Camfferman G; van Engeland H
    Biol Psychiatry; 1996 Sep; 40(6):522-34. PubMed ID: 8879473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related potentials accompanying motor preparation and stimulus expectancy in the young, young-old and oldest-old.
    Golob EJ; Ovasapyan V; Starr A
    Neurobiol Aging; 2005 Apr; 26(4):531-42. PubMed ID: 15653181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity.
    Alho K; Escera C; Díaz R; Yago E; Serra JM
    Neuroreport; 1997 Oct; 8(15):3233-7. PubMed ID: 9351649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved detection of auditory P3 abnormality in dementia using a variety of stimuli.
    Attias J; Huberman M; Cott E; Pratt H
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1995 Jul; 92(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 7572070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of immediate and short-term retest on the latencies and amplitudes of the auditory event-related potentials in healthy adults.
    Gandelman-Marton R; Theitler J; Klein C; Rabey JM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Jan; 186(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 19854216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. P300, habituation, and response mode.
    Lew GS; Polich J
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Jan; 53(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 8434050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.