153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7694409)
1. Triage of patients with abnormal cervical smears in the absence of colposcopy.
Omigbodun AO; Thomas JO; Adewole IF; Ogunlusi ML
Trop Geogr Med; 1993; 45(4):157-8. PubMed ID: 7694409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ?
Denny LA; Soeters R; Dehaeck K; Bloch B
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jul; 102(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 7647056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective analysis of 94 patients with CIN and false negative cervical smears taken at colposcopy.
Beeby AR; Wadehra V; Keating PJ; Wagstaff TI
Cytopathology; 1993; 4(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 8110972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and human papillomavirus infection: punch biopsy versus cervical smear.
Gitsch G; Reinthaller A; Tatra G; Breitenecker G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 249(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 1665685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective follow up study of women with colposcopically unconfirmed positive cervical smears.
Milne DS; Wadehra V; Mennim D; Wagstaff TI
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jan; 106(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 10426257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AgNOR protein quantity of cervical smears correlates with that of histological sections in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Pelusi G; Trerè D; Formelli G; Rinaldi AM; Derenzini M
Eur J Histochem; 1997; 41(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 9271702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears. A diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist.
Busseniers AE; Sidawy MK
J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 2010900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala, India.
Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Thara S; Dhakad N; Chandralekha B; Sebastian P; Chithrathara K; Parkin DM; Nair MK
Int J Cancer; 2003 Sep; 106(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 12845681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of cytology and visual triage of human papillomavirus-positive women in cervical cancer prevention in India.
Muwonge R; Wesley RS; Nene BM; Shastri SS; Jayant K; Malvi SG; Thara S; Sankaranarayanan R
Int J Cancer; 2014 Jun; 134(12):2902-9. PubMed ID: 24272364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive cervical smear with subsequent normal colposcopy and histology--frequency of CIN in a long-term follow-up.
Hellberg D; Nilsson S; Valentin J
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 May; 53(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 8188072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-risk HPV testing in women with borderline and mild dyskaryosis: long-term follow-up data and clinical relevance.
Denise Zielinski G; Snijders PJ; Rozendaal L; Voorhorst FJ; Runsink AP; de Schipper FA; Meijer CJ
J Pathol; 2001 Oct; 195(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 11673826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
