These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7695808)

  • 1. Critically evaluating research studies.
    Rogers B
    AAOHN J; 1995 Jan; 43(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 7695808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
    Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
    Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
    Koop PP
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing critical appraisal skills.
    McCaughan D
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Sep; 14(12):843-7. PubMed ID: 10603895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methods and instruments of research. Analysis of various articles].
    Riv Inferm; 1996; 15(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9001064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning to give and accept research critiques: some unique models.
    Ingram C
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2000; 10(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 10887858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The "so what" question: the impact of nursing research.
    Mitchell PH
    J Prof Nurs; 2004; 20(6):347-8. PubMed ID: 15599866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The introduction of a performance-based system for funding research.
    Smith T
    Nurs Prax N Z; 2006 Mar; 22(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17205666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to critique a research study.
    Fosbinder D; Loveridge C
    Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1996; 2(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 9447093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Receiving feedback from reviewers: how to make the most of criticism.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(4):148-50. PubMed ID: 10786470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making processes transparent.
    King KM
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2003; 13(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 12703104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the quality of research: a challenge for nursing.
    Luker K
    Nurs Inq; 2007 Mar; 14(1):1. PubMed ID: 17298602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The critique: a necessary part of scientific inquiry.
    Schmelzer M
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2006; 29(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 16974173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles.
    Froman RD; Schmitt MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the practicality of research findings for clinical practice.
    Girard N
    Semin Perioper Nurs; 1999 Jan; 8(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 10476200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical appraisal. 8. Appraising qualitative research.
    Thompson C
    NT Learn Curve; 1999 Nov; 3(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 10827680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.