These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7698779)
21. Cortical imaging on a head template: a simulation study using a resistor mesh model (RMM). Chauveau N; Franceries X; Aubry F; Celsis P; Rigaud B Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18629625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Left-right asymmetry of visual evoked potentials in brain-damaged patients: a mathematical model and experimental results. Abboud S; Bar L; Rosenfeld M; Ring H; Glass I Ann Biomed Eng; 1996; 24(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 8669720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of inhomogeneities on surface signals coming from a cerebral current-dipole source. Schneider M IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1974 Jan; 21(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 4813877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Computational representation of a realistic head and brain volume conductor model: electroencephalography simulation and visualization study. Kybartaite A Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1144-55. PubMed ID: 23109383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Location of electric current sources in the human brain estimated by the dipole tracing method of the scalp-skull-brain (SSB) head model. Homma S; Musha T; Nakajima Y; Okamoto Y; Blom S; Flink R; Hagbarth KE; Moström U Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 91(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 7525234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography. Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A modified boundary element method for the estimation of potential fields on the scalp. Srebro R IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Jun; 43(6):650-3. PubMed ID: 8987269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The influence of mutual arrangement of the electric dipole and the spatial nonuniformity of brain electrical conductivity on the solution of the direct task of electroencephalography using the method of finite elements]. Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL Biofizika; 2010; 55(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 20429287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull. Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Malmivuo JA IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1851-8. PubMed ID: 16941841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Model estimates of CSF and skull influences on scalp-recorded ERPs. Pfefferbaum A Alcohol; 1990; 7(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 2222852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Functional correlates with left-right asymmetry of visual evoked potentials in stroke patients: modeling and experimental results. Ring H; Bar L; Abboud S Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 80(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 10025491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Method to reduce blur distortion from EEG's using a realistic head model. Le J; Gevins A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jun; 40(6):517-28. PubMed ID: 8262533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Modeling the effect of the layer thickness and tissue conductivities of the head and the brain on the EEG potentials using finite element method]. Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL; Verkhliutov VM Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(6):742-52. PubMed ID: 18592709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extent of cortical generators visible on the scalp: effect of a subdural grid. von Ellenrieder N; Beltrachini L; Muravchik CH; Gotman J Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():787-95. PubMed ID: 25117602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head. Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Skull Modeling Effects in Conductivity Estimates Using Parametric Electrical Impedance Tomography. Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Luu P; Price N; Muravchik CH; Tucker D IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1785-1797. PubMed ID: 29989921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method. Meijs JW; Weier OW; Peters MJ; van Oosterom A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1989 Oct; 36(10):1038-49. PubMed ID: 2793196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models. Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Estimation of electrical conductivity distribution within the human head from magnetic flux density measurement. Gao N; Zhu SA; He B Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2675-87. PubMed ID: 15901962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model. Wen P Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]