129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7699103)
21. Solid or gaseous circulating brain emboli: are they separable by transcranial ultrasound?
Darbellay GA; Duff R; Vesin JM; Despland PA; Droste DW; Molina C; Serena J; Sztajzel R; Ruchat P; Karapanayiotides T; Kalangos A; Bogousslavsky J; Ringelstein EB; Devuyst G
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2004 Aug; 24(8):860-8. PubMed ID: 15362716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transcranial Doppler characteristics of different embolic materials during in vivo testing.
Rodriguez RA; Giachino A; Hosking M; Nathan HJ
J Neuroimaging; 2002 Jul; 12(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12116745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection and volume estimation of embolic air in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler sonography.
Bunegin L; Wahl D; Albin MS
Stroke; 1994 Mar; 25(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 7907447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Detection of asymptomatic cerebral embolic signals with Doppler ultrasound.
Markus HS; Droste DW; Brown MM
Lancet; 1994 Apr; 343(8904):1011-2. PubMed ID: 7909051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of Doppler embolic signals: psychoacoustic considerations.
Chung E; Fan L; Degg C; Evans DH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1177-84. PubMed ID: 16176785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Analysis of the frequency modulation present in Doppler ultrasound signals may allow differentiation between particulate and gaseous cerebral emboli.
Smith JL; Evans DH; Naylor AR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(5):727-34. PubMed ID: 9253820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Online automatic discrimination between solid and gaseous cerebral microemboli with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler.
Russell D; Brucher R
Stroke; 2002 Aug; 33(8):1975-80. PubMed ID: 12154248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic Accuracy of an Algorithm for Discriminating Presumed Solid and Gaseous Microembolic Signals During Transcranial Doppler Examinations.
Keunen RWM; Daal SM; Romers GJ; Hoohenkerk GJF; van Kampen PM; Suyker WJL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Dec; 49(12):2483-2488. PubMed ID: 37709563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of embolic signals using Doppler ultrasound: a new approach to cardiac embolism.
Pettelot G; Bracco J; Gibelin P; Baudouy M; Barrillon D; Morand P
Int J Cardiol; 1997 Jan; 58(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9021422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automatic detection of bubbles in the subclavian vein using Doppler ultrasound signals.
Tufan K; Ademoglu A; Kurtaran E; Yildiz G; Aydin S; Egi SM
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):957-62. PubMed ID: 16964747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differentiation between emboli and artefacts using dual-gated transcranial Doppler ultrasound.
Smith JL; Evans DH; Fan L; Bell PR; Naylor AR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1996; 22(8):1031-6. PubMed ID: 9004426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of middle cerebral artery emboli during carotid endarterectomy using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography.
Spencer MP; Thomas GI; Nicholls SC; Sauvage LR
Stroke; 1990 Mar; 21(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 2408197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The matching pursuit: a new method of characterizing microembolic signals?
Devuyst G; Vesin JM; Despland PA; Bogousslavsky J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 26(6):1051-6. PubMed ID: 10996705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sequential Emboli Detection From Ultrasound Outpatient Data.
Guepie BK; Martin M; Lacrosaz V; Almar M; Guibert B; Delachartre P
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2019 Jan; 23(1):334-341. PubMed ID: 29994445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Thrombus size and Doppler embolic signal intensity.
Martin MJ; Chung EM; Ramnarine KV; Goodall AH; Naylor AR; Evans DH
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2009; 28(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 19713699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Importance of time-window overlap in the detection and analysis of embolic signals.
Markus H
Stroke; 1995 Nov; 26(11):2044-7. PubMed ID: 7482647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automatic classification of HITS into artifacts or solid or gaseous emboli by a wavelet representation combined with dual-gate TCD.
Devuyst G; Darbellay GA; Vesin JM; Kemény V; Ritter M; Droste DW; Molina C; Serena J; Sztajzel R; Ruchat P; Lucchesi C; Dietler G; Ringelstein EB; Despland PA; Bogousslavsky J
Stroke; 2001 Dec; 32(12):2803-9. PubMed ID: 11739977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of high intensity transient signals (HITS): how and why?
Droste DW; Ringelstein EB
Eur J Ultrasound; 1998 Feb; 7(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 9614287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How good is intercenter agreement in the identification of embolic signals in carotid artery disease?
Markus H; Bland JM; Rose G; Sitzer M; Siebler M
Stroke; 1996 Jul; 27(7):1249-52. PubMed ID: 8685937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An automated microemboli detection and classification system using backscatter RF signals and differential evolution.
Ferroudji K; Benoudjit N; Bouakaz A
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Mar; 40(1):85-99. PubMed ID: 28070749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
