These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7699157)

  • 1. Timbral aspects of reproduced sound in small rooms. I.
    Bech S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1717-26. PubMed ID: 7699157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial aspects of reproduced sound in small rooms.
    Bech S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):434-45. PubMed ID: 9440331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judgments of noticeable differences in sound fields of concert halls caused by intensity variations in early reflections.
    Okano T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):217-29. PubMed ID: 11831797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of early and late reflections on perception of source orientation.
    Steffens H; van de Par S; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Apr; 149(4):2255. PubMed ID: 33940902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateral reflections are favorable in concert halls due to binaural loudness.
    Lokki T; Pätynen J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL345-51. PubMed ID: 22088039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of spectral overlap on the echo suppression threshold for single reflection conditions.
    Walther A; Robinson P; Santala O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL158-64. PubMed ID: 23927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech segregation in rooms: effects of reverberation on both target and interferer.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1713. PubMed ID: 17927431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech intelligibility in rooms: Effect of prior listening exposure interacts with room acoustics.
    Zahorik P; Brandewie EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):74. PubMed ID: 27475133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using personal response systems to assess speech perception within the classroom: an approach to determine the efficacy of sound field amplification in primary school classrooms.
    Vickers DA; Backus BC; Macdonald NK; Rostamzadeh NK; Mason NK; Pandya R; Marriage JE; Mahon MH
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 23340455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural Loudness Constancy.
    Culling JF; Dare H
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():65-72. PubMed ID: 27080647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived loudness and visually-determined auditory distance.
    Mershon DH; Desaulniers DH; Kiefer SA; Amerson TL; Mills JT
    Perception; 1981; 10(5):531-43. PubMed ID: 7339572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Autophonic Loudness of Singers in Simulated Room Acoustic Environments.
    Yadav M; Cabrera D
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):388.e13-388.e25. PubMed ID: 27742495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equal autophonic level curves under different room acoustics conditions.
    Pelegrín-García D; Fuentes-Mendizábal O; Brunskog J; Jeong CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):228-38. PubMed ID: 21786893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Echo thresholds for reflections from acoustically diffusive architectural surfaces.
    Robinson PW; Walther A; Faller C; Braasch J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2755-64. PubMed ID: 24116414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of reverberation on personal audio devices.
    Simón-Gálvez MF; Elliott SJ; Cheer J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):2654-63. PubMed ID: 24815249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.