89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7699159)
1. Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: the effect of modulation depth.
McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1777-85. PubMed ID: 7699159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees.
McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2664-73. PubMed ID: 7983272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.
McKay CM; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees.
McKay CM; Henshall KR
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 19798533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pitch of amplitude-modulated irregular-rate stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Long CJ; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1516-28. PubMed ID: 14514205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing.
Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Long CJ; Deeks JM; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):621-33. PubMed ID: 12186042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.
Litvak L; Delgutte B; Eddington D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):368-79. PubMed ID: 11508961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated intracochlear electrical pulses in deaf cats.
Snyder RL; Vollmer M; Moore CM; Rebscher SJ; Leake PA; Beitel RE
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Jul; 84(1):166-83. PubMed ID: 10899194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals.
Lindenbeck MJ; Laback B; Majdak P; Srinivasan S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Feb; 147(2):777. PubMed ID: 32113255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pitch and loudness estimation for single and multiple pulse per period electric pulse rates by cochlear implant patients.
Busby PA; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1687-95. PubMed ID: 9069636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing.
Zeng FG; Shannon RV
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():235-8. PubMed ID: 7668651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of rate of change of frequency on the overall pitch of frequency-modulated tones.
Gockel H; Moore BC; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):701-12. PubMed ID: 11248974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.
Cariani PA; Delgutte B
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 76(3):1717-34. PubMed ID: 8890287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users.
Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):656-9. PubMed ID: 20136187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined neural and behavioural measures of temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2885-905. PubMed ID: 26627764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
