These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7699596)

  • 1. Clinical and experimental bone changes after intraosseous implantation.
    Murphy WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jan; 73(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 7699596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling.
    Stanford CM; Brand RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 10220659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The morphological and clinical relevance of mandibular and maxillary bone structures for implantation.
    Fanghänel J; Proff P; Dietze S; Bayerlein T; Mack F; Gedrange T
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2006 Feb; 65(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 16783736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular bone remodeling induced by dental implant.
    Lin D; Li Q; Li W; Duckmanton N; Swain M
    J Biomech; 2010 Jan; 43(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 19815211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone response to early orthodontic loading of endosseous implants.
    Yavuz U; Kirtiloglu T; Acikgoz G; Turk T; Trisi P
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():87-95. PubMed ID: 20594061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The biologic tissue responses to uncoated and coated implanted biomaterials.
    Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Young TR; Sisk AL; Parr GR
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():27-33. PubMed ID: 11276743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of implant diameter on surrounding bone.
    Brink J; Meraw SJ; Sarment DP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 17590162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the time of osseointegration in the maxilla and mandible differ?
    Gehrke SA; Tavares da Silva Neto U
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2117-20. PubMed ID: 25329842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular growth following implant restoration: does Wolff's law apply to residual ridge resorption?
    Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Wang IC; Liu PR; Hsu YT; Jeffcoat RL; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 12212678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical properties of bone tissues surrounding dental implant systems with different treatments and healing periods.
    Kim DG; Kwon HJ; Jeong YH; Kosel E; Lee DJ; Han JS; Kim HL; Kim DJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2211-2220. PubMed ID: 26832783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Functionally stressed ceramic implants and tissue reactions. A long-term experimental animal and clinical study].
    Kirschner H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1983 Mar; 38(3):238-53. PubMed ID: 6573255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osseointegration of short titan implants: A pilot study in pigs.
    Botzenhart U; Kunert-Keil C; Heinemann F; Gredes T; Seiler J; Berniczei-Roykó Á; Gedrange T
    Ann Anat; 2015 May; 199():16-22. PubMed ID: 24780612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aspects on osseointegrated implants inserted in growing jaws. A biometric and radiographic study in the young pig.
    Thilander B; Odman J; Gröndahl K; Lekholm U
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Apr; 14(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 1582464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxilla vs mandible: why use HA?
    Meffert RM
    Compend Suppl; 1993; (15):S533-8; quiz S565-6. PubMed ID: 8187138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
    Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of irradiation on bone remodelling around mandibular implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Brasseur M; Brogniez V; Grégoire V; Reychler H; Lengelé B; D'Hoore W; Nyssen-Behets C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):850-5. PubMed ID: 16697145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fractal dimension analysis of mandibular bones: toward a morphological compatibility of implants.
    Oshida Y; Hashem A; Nishihara T; Yapchulay MV
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(5):397-407. PubMed ID: 8000293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support.
    Krekmanov L; Kahn M; Rangert B; Lindström H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 10874806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.