These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7700156)

  • 1. Interior-branch and bootstrap tests of phylogenetic trees.
    Sitnikova T; Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Mar; 12(2):319-33. PubMed ID: 7700156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bootstrap method of interior-branch test for phylogenetic trees.
    Sitnikova T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Apr; 13(4):605-11. PubMed ID: 8882503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences. I. Four taxa with a molecular clock.
    Zharkikh A; Li WH
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 Nov; 9(6):1119-47. PubMed ID: 1435238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical method for estimating the standard errors of branch lengths in a phylogenetic tree reconstructed without assuming equal rates of nucleotide substitution among different lineages.
    Tajima F
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 Jan; 9(1):168-81. PubMed ID: 1552838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quartet-mapping, a generalization of the likelihood-mapping procedure.
    Nieselt-Struwe K; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Jul; 18(7):1204-19. PubMed ID: 11420361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
    Antezana M
    J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tie trees generated by distance methods of phylogenetic reconstruction.
    Takezaki N
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Jun; 15(6):727-37. PubMed ID: 9615454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phylogeny for the faint of heart: a tutorial.
    Baldauf SL
    Trends Genet; 2003 Jun; 19(6):345-51. PubMed ID: 12801728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Reliability and Stability of an Inferred Phylogenetic Tree from Empirical Data.
    Katsura Y; Stanley CE; Kumar S; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Mar; 34(3):718-723. PubMed ID: 28100791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences: II. Four taxa without a molecular clock.
    Zharkikh A; Li WH
    J Mol Evol; 1992 Oct; 35(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 1404421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measures of clade confidence do not correlate with accuracy of phylogenetic trees.
    Hall BG; Salipante SJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Mar; 3(3):e51. PubMed ID: 17367204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical measures of uncertainty for branches in phylogenetic trees inferred from molecular sequences by using model-based methods.
    Wróbel B
    J Appl Genet; 2008; 49(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 18263970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bootstrap hypothesis tests for evolutionary trees and other dendrograms.
    Brown JK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1994 Dec; 91(25):12293-7. PubMed ID: 7991621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative.
    Anisimova M; Gascuel O
    Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):539-52. PubMed ID: 16785212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case.
    Cummings MP; Handley SA; Myers DS; Reed DL; Rokas A; Winka K
    Syst Biol; 2003 Aug; 52(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 12857639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of confidence in phylogeny: the complete-and-partial bootstrap technique.
    Zharkikh A; Li WH
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1995 Mar; 4(1):44-63. PubMed ID: 7620635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.