These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7700156)

  • 21. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small.
    Nei M; Kumar S; Takahashi K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Oct; 95(21):12390-7. PubMed ID: 9770497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of the distribution of bootstrap tree lengths using the maximum parsimony method.
    Bhattacharya D
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1996 Dec; 6(3):339-50. PubMed ID: 8975690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A modification of the PHYLIP program: A solution for the redundant cluster problem, and an implementation of an automatic bootstrapping on trees inferred from original data.
    Shimada MK; Nishida T
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Apr; 109():409-414. PubMed ID: 28232198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phylogeny of the genus Chironomus (Diptera) inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase I.
    Guryev V; Makarevitch I; Blinov A; Martin J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2001 Apr; 19(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 11286487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bayesian support is larger than bootstrap support in phylogenetic inference: a mathematical argument.
    Britton T; Svennblad B; Erixon P; Oxelman B
    Math Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 24(4):401-11. PubMed ID: 17977880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measuring branch support in species trees obtained by gene tree parsimony.
    Joly S; Bruneau A
    Syst Biol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):100-13. PubMed ID: 20525571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the distributions of bootstrap support and posterior distributions for a star tree.
    Susko E
    Syst Biol; 2008 Aug; 57(4):602-12. PubMed ID: 18709598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The applicability of ordinary least squares to consistently short distances between taxa in phylogenetic tree construction and the normal distribution test consequences.
    Roux CZ
    Bull Math Biol; 2009 May; 71(4):771-80. PubMed ID: 19130144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Calculating the evolutionary rates of different genes: a fast, accurate estimator with applications to maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis.
    Bevan RB; Lang BF; Bryant D
    Syst Biol; 2005 Dec; 54(6):900-15. PubMed ID: 16282169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection.
    Shimodaira H
    Syst Biol; 2002 Jun; 51(3):492-508. PubMed ID: 12079646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference.
    Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1993 Sep; 10(5):1073-95. PubMed ID: 8412650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A stepwise algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees.
    Kumar S
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Apr; 13(4):584-93. PubMed ID: 8882501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap.
    Minh BQ; Nguyen MA; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 May; 30(5):1188-95. PubMed ID: 23418397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics.
    Suzuki Y; Glazko GV; Nei M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Dec; 99(25):16138-43. PubMed ID: 12451182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Family-Joining: A Fast Distance-Based Method for Constructing Generally Labeled Trees.
    Kalaghatgi P; Pfeifer N; Lengauer T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Oct; 33(10):2720-34. PubMed ID: 27436007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When is it safe to use an oversimplified substitution model in tree-making?
    Rzhetsky A; Sitnikova T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Nov; 13(9):1255-65. PubMed ID: 8896378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree.
    Gadagkar SR; Rosenberg MS; Kumar S
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2005 Jan; 304(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 15593277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees.
    Soria-Carrasco V; Talavera G; Igea J; Castresana J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2954-6. PubMed ID: 17890735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The efficiency of different search strategies in estimating parsimony jackknife, bootstrap, and Bremer support.
    Müller KF
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Oct; 5():58. PubMed ID: 16255783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.