These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7700192)

  • 1. A comparison of mono- and poly-energetic x-ray beam performance for radiographic and fluoroscopic imaging.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1853-63. PubMed ID: 7700192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo study of x-ray fluorescence in x-ray detectors.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA; Sabol JM; Tecotzky M
    Med Phys; 1999 Jun; 26(6):905-16. PubMed ID: 10436891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
    Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of beam-hardening and K-edge filters for imaging barium and iodine during fluoroscopy.
    Gagne RM; Quinn PW; Jennings RJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 8164575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):537-59. PubMed ID: 10070800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of vessel contrast measured with a scanning-beam digital x-ray system and an image intensifier/television system.
    Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Heanue JA; Betts TD; Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 11243348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of antiscatter grids in diagnostic radiology: experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Chan HP; Higashida Y; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 4033591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of image quality in fluoroscopy by measurements and Monte Carlo calculations.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Apr; 40(4):589-607. PubMed ID: 7610116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Figure of Merit Comparison between Bremsstrahlung and Monoenergetic X-Ray Sources for Angiography.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA
    J Xray Sci Technol; 1994 Jan; 4(4):334-45. PubMed ID: 21307470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Light output measurements and computational models of microcolumnar CsI scintillators for x-ray imaging.
    Nillius P; Klamra W; Sibczynski P; Sharma D; Danielsson M; Badano A
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):600-605. PubMed ID: 28102604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compact x-ray sources for mammographic applications: Monte Carlo simulations of image quality.
    Oliva P; Golosio B; Stumbo S; Bravin A; Tomassini P
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5149-61. PubMed ID: 19994525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. X-ray scatter in megavoltage transmission radiography: physical characteristics and influence on image quality.
    Jaffray DA; Battista JJ; Fenster A; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 8164588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overestimations in zero frequency DQE of x-ray imaging converters assessed by Monte Carlo techniques based on the study of energy impartation events.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4440-50. PubMed ID: 21859045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filter material selection for region of interest radiologic imaging.
    Massoumzadeh P; Rudin S; Bednarek DR
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9507475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The upper limits of the SNR in radiography and CT with polyenergetic x-rays.
    Shikhaliev PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5317-39. PubMed ID: 20736493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.