209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7700938)
1. Bone marrow processing for transplantation using a Fenwal CS3000 Plus cell separator and a revised version of the Georgetown University procedure: comparison with a starch sedimentation method.
Smith RJ; Roath S
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 389():705-10. PubMed ID: 7700938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Processing of bone marrow for transplantation: development of a mononuclear cell enrichment protocol.
Hollingsworth KL; Williams SF; Blake MS; Pothiawala M; Mick R; Larson RA; Bender JG
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 389():695-704. PubMed ID: 7700937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A manual method for processing bone marrow using percoll: characteristics of the transfusion product.
Glasser L; Smith DM; Fiederlein RL; Wood M
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 389():685-94. PubMed ID: 7700936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid and automated processing of bone marrow grafts without Ficoll density gradient for transplantation of cryopreserved autologous or ABO-incompatible allogeneic bone marrow.
Schanz U; Gmür J
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1992 Dec; 10(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 1490200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid and safe automated processing of bone marrow grafts without using density gradient cryopreservation and transplantation.
Deméocq F; Kanold J; Bezou MJ; Travade P; Chassagne J; Berger M
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 389():675-84. PubMed ID: 7700935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Concentration of bone marrow progenitor cells by separation on a Percoll gradient using the Haemonetics model 30.
Humblet Y; Lefebvre P; Jacques JL; Bosly A; Feyens AM; Sekhavat M; Agaliotis D; Symann M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1988 Jan; 3(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 2901880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Density-gradient separation for 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide purging of autologous bone marrow grafts.
Rowley S; Davis J; Braine H; Jones R; Yeager A; Saral R; Santos G
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 333():369-77. PubMed ID: 2308991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated isolation of mononuclear cells using the Fenwal CS3000 blood cell separator.
Areman EM; Cullis H; Sacher RA; Cottler-Fox M; Deeg HJ
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 333():379-85. PubMed ID: 2308992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: approaches to an optimal blood stem cell collection.
Coffe C; Couteret Y; Devillers M; Fest T; Morel P; Pouthier-Stein F; Calot JP; Novakovitch G; Sitthy X; Tremisi PJ
Transfus Sci; 1992; 13(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 10147737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Erythrocyte removal from bone marrow by density gradient separation using the COBE 2991 cell processor with the triple-bag processing set].
Cappellesso-Fleury S; Rage C; Tschaggeny F; Gaudé J; Gomez M; Bourin P
Transfus Clin Biol; 2009 Mar; 16(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 19200762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two methods of bone marrow processing for autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Letheby B; Jackson J; Greally J; Warkentin P; Smith D; Vose J; Bierman P; Kessinger A; Coccia P; Armitage J
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1992; 377():345-51. PubMed ID: 1279712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The absolute number of circulating CD34+ cells predicts the number of hematopoietic stem cells that can be collected by apheresis.
Schots R; Van Riet I; Damiaens S; Flament J; Lacor P; Staelens Y; Steenssens L; van Camp B; De Waele M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 Apr; 17(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 8722347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Red cell salvage and reinfusion in pediatric bone marrow donors.
Kletzel M; Olszewski M; Danner-Koptik K; Coyne K; Haut P
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Aug; 24(4):385-8. PubMed ID: 10467327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Stem cell concentrates in autologous transplantation].
Zingsem J; Zeiler T; Weisbach V; Musch R; Heuft HG; Siegert W; Eckstein R
Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():197-9. PubMed ID: 1703829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between two different procedures for bone marrow processing: a semiautomated procedure vs manual starch sedimentation.
Menichella G; Pierelli L; Serafini R; Foddai ML; Vittori M; Paoloni A; De Martini M; Rossi PL; Mango G; Bizzi B
Haematologica; 1991 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():12-4. PubMed ID: 1713872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simple method for depletion of bone fragments from human vertebral body marrow.
Kong SS; Selvaggi G; Kenyon N; Bottino R; Linetsky E; Ricordi C
Transplant Proc; 1995 Dec; 27(6):3417. PubMed ID: 8540029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Component processing and intraoperative autotransfusion during bone marrow harvest.
Cook-Craig A; Owen A; Reeder G; Drobyski W; Horowitz M; Brunner J; Flomenberg N; Keever C
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 389():613-9. PubMed ID: 7700927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Removal of erythrocytes from bone marrow preparations by the method of centrifugation in the "liquid for lymphocyte isolation"].
Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W; Ratajczak MZ
Acta Haematol Pol; 1987; 18(3-4):216-9. PubMed ID: 3330399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effect of the centrifugation speed on the sedimentation behavior of thrombocytes in the CS-3000 Cell Separator (Fenwal)].
Brauer H; Aulmann HM; Stangel W
Beitr Infusionther Klin Ernahr; 1987; 18():219-22. PubMed ID: 3439977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone marrow transplantation with major ABO blood group incompatibility using automated removal of red blood cells from incompatible bone marrow by CS 3000 plus.
O-Charoen R; Soiprasert P; Chaisiripoomkere W; Jootar S; Chiewsilp P
Transplant Proc; 1994 Aug; 26(4):2352-3. PubMed ID: 8066772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
