BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7701487)

  • 1. [Mass screening against cervical cancer--what are the viewpoints of female general practitioners?].
    Krohg M; Malterud K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Mar; 115(7):817-9. PubMed ID: 7701487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cervical cytological tests among female general practitioners. A study of health habits of physicians].
    Krohg M; Malterud K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):335-7. PubMed ID: 8191433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for cervical cancer: attitudes and policies among Auckland general practitioners.
    McMaster H; Arroll B
    N Z Med J; 1992 Apr; 105(931):125-7. PubMed ID: 1560922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for cervical cancer among female physicians and their relatives in Taiwan: a population-based comparative study.
    Chen LS; Huang N; Tsay JH; Wang PJ; Chou YJ; Chou P; Lee CH
    Prev Med; 2007 Jun; 44(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 17467786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programme in the Harare City Health Department, Zimbabwe.
    Moyo IM; Koni NP; Makunike B; Hipshman J; Makaure HK; Gumbo N
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Aug; 43(8):223-5. PubMed ID: 9431759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
    Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
    Voordijk-van der Ben MH; Buntinx F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10674106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
    Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Have the most recent Pap smear guidelines affected GP practices?
    Wai D; Ferrier A; Collings S; Laverty C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S44-8. PubMed ID: 9479800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. General practitioners' perception of risk factors for cervical cancer development: consequences for patient education.
    Baay MF; Verhoeven V; Peremans L; Avonts D; Vermorken JB
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Aug; 62(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 16533588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
    Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cytology history in Irish doctors and midwives.
    Lyons F; Walsh T; Hayden C; Boyd W; Coughlan BM
    Ir Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(6):176-8. PubMed ID: 11105441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of knowledge, attitude, and practice of cervical screening among female primary care physicians in the United Arab Emirates.
    Badrinath P; Ghazal-Aswad S; Osman N; Deemas E; McIlvenny S
    Health Care Women Int; 2004 Aug; 25(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 15487484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a Pap smear quality-assurance system in family practice.
    Curtis P; Varenholt JJ; Skinner B; Addison L; Resnick J; Kebede M
    Fam Med; 1993 Feb; 25(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 8458544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
    Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening for cervical cancer by general practitioners in Ghent, Belgium.
    De Schryver A; Derese A; Geldhof A; Vuylsteek K
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1989; 13(5-6):343-8. PubMed ID: 2743357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.