These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7702336)
1. [Comparative thrombotic risk of two contrast agents in coronary angiography]. Wolff F; Zupan M; Klero de Rosbo P; Wiesel ML; Grunebaum L; Cazenave JP; Brechenmacher C Ann Radiol (Paris); 1994; 37(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 7702336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TAT, F1 + 2, and D-dimer levels in patients after coronary angiography with nonionic or ionic contrast media or after cardiac catheterization. Biancardi M; Cimminiello C; Toschi V; Schiavina G; Regalia F; Casolo F; Bonfardeci G Semin Thromb Hemost; 1996; 22 Suppl 1():61-5. PubMed ID: 8807731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy. Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effects of contrast media under systemic heparinization on blood coagulation and fibrinolytic system during angiocardiography--comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media]. Himi K; Takemoto A; Himi S; Kamata R Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Aug; 52(8):1139-47. PubMed ID: 1408685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of nonionic and ionic contrast media on fibrinolysis in patients undergoing angiography. Giedrojć J; Radziwon P; Krupiński K; Kiełpińska K; Galar M; Bielawiec M Pol J Pharmacol; 1996; 48(3):323-6. PubMed ID: 9112670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. II. Clinical considerations. Dawson P; Cousins C; Bradshaw A Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S31-6; discussion S37-8. PubMed ID: 8282500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Activation of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis after angiocardiography with ionic and non-ionic contrast media]. Winkler UH; Park JW; Weber S; Kothe A; Schnitker J; Behrends-Steins B; Albring M Rofo; 1997 Jun; 166(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 9273008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention. Juergens CP; Khaing AM; McIntyre GJ; Leung DY; Lo ST; Fernandes C; Hopkins AP Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Haemostatic effects of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media: a double-blind comparative study. Hoffmann JJ; Tielbeek AV; Krause W Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):248-55. PubMed ID: 10817039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clotting issue: etiologic factors in thromboembolism. I. Chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of angiographic contrast agents. Dawson P Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S25-30. PubMed ID: 8282499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of an ionic compared to a non-ionic X-ray contrast agent on platelets and coagulation during diagnostic cardiac catheterisation. Jung F; Spitzer SG; Pindur G Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb; 2002; 32(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 12372925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of low-osmolality contrast media in thromboembolic complications: scanning electron microscopy study. Casalini E Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):741-4. PubMed ID: 1584930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems leads to hemorrhagic complications during left ventricular assist implantation. Livingston ER; Fisher CA; Bibidakis EJ; Pathak AS; Todd BA; Furukawa S; McClurken JB; Addonizio VP; Jeevanandam V Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II227-34. PubMed ID: 8901751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Tolerability of a new non-ionic contrast medium, iopromide in x-ray computed tomography. Comparison with ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml]. Fredy D; Heitz F; Mathieu D; Vasile N Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):358-60. PubMed ID: 2688533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biochemical evidence for a relative lack of inhibition of thrombin formation by nonionic contrast media. Mamon JF; Hoppensteadt D; Fareed J; Moncada R Radiology; 1991 May; 179(2):399-402. PubMed ID: 2014281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of arterial cannulation and contrast agents on blood coagulation. Cousins C; Dutka DP; Bradshaw A; Dawson P Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):663-6. PubMed ID: 9419621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The assessment of thrombotic markers utilizing ionic versus non-ionic contrast during coronary angiography and intervention trial. Shah B; Berger JS; Allen N; Guo Y; Sedlis SP; Xu J; Perez A; Attubato M; Slater J; Feit F Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(5):727-737. PubMed ID: 26773574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of the pro-thrombotic state in CAPD patients. Preloznik Zupan I; Sabovic M; Salobir B; Buturovic Ponikvar J Ren Fail; 2008; 30(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 18661409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of an ionic versus a nonionic low osmolar contrast agent on the thrombotic complications of coronary angioplasty. Piessens JH; Stammen F; Vrolix MC; Glazier JJ; Benit E; De Geest H; Willems JL Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Feb; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 8448808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of cardiac ischemia and reperfusion on markers of activated haemostasis and fibrinolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of plasma levels in arterial and coronary venous blood. Kalweit G; Bach J; Huwer H; Winning J; Hellstern P Thromb Res; 2005; 116(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15850606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]