These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7704062)
1. Evaluating print health education materials. Cory J; Bottum C; Haddock C Cancer Pract; 1995; 3(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 7704062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient education materials: are they readable? Stephens ST Oncol Nurs Forum; 1992; 19(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 1538991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Written patient-education materials. Stewart KB Nursing; 1996 Jan; 26(1):32j-32k. PubMed ID: 8632848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A critique of the AHCPR's "Preventing pressure ulcers--a patient's guide" as a written instructional tool. Ayello EA Decubitus; 1993 May; 6(3):44-6, 48-50. PubMed ID: 8347284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving patient education for poor readers. Brownson K Nurs Spectr (Wash D C); 1999 Mar; 9(5):12-4. PubMed ID: 10562175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the readability of your patient education materials. There's more to it than simply applying a formula. Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Oct; 14(2):6-8. PubMed ID: 10175261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability of written materials: implications for critical care nurses. Ott BB; Hardie TL Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1995; 14(6):328-34. PubMed ID: 8631215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tips for improving patient education materials. The right readability level is one key to success. Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Oct; 14(2):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10175257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. It's on paper, but do they understand it? RN; 1999 Oct; 62(10):24hf1, 24hf4. PubMed ID: 10578947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Literacy: a problem that managers must handle. Brownson K Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1998 Aug; 20(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 10181321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating patient health education printed materials: a case study. Tierney DO; Eisenberg MG Hosp Top; 1986; 64(2):28-9, 33. PubMed ID: 10275506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient education. Teaching clients with low-literacy skills. Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2000 Dec; 17(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 11188114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of reading comprehension level for effective patient health-education materials. Miller B; Bodie M Nurs Res; 1994; 43(2):118-9. PubMed ID: 8152936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations. Campbell FA; Goldman BD; Boccia ML; Skinner M Patient Educ Couns; 2004 May; 53(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 15140461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. American Academy of Family Physicians patient education materials: can patients read them? Wallace LS; Lennon ES Fam Med; 2004 Sep; 36(8):571-4. PubMed ID: 15343418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suitability and readability assessment of educational print resources related to physical activity: implications and recommendations for practice. Vallance JK; Taylor LM; Lavallee C Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Aug; 72(2):342-9. PubMed ID: 18450409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]