120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7705181)
1. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
Piper J; Rutovitz D; Sudar D; Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 7705181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
du Manoir S; Schröck E; Bentz M; Speicher MR; Joos S; Ried T; Lichter P; Cremer T
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 7705182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization.
Lundsteen C; Maahr J; Christensen B; Bryndorf T; Bentz M; Lichter P; Gerdes T
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 7705184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Key technologies in image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization].
Ni J; Ji L; Wang M
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 18(4):620-3. PubMed ID: 11791323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals.
Kirchhoff M; Gerdes T; Rose H; Maahr J; Ottesen AM; Lundsteen C
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 9515715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low number of DNA copy number changes in small lymphocytic lymphoma.
Autio K; Aalto Y; Franssila K; Elonen E; Joensuu H; Knuutila S
Haematologica; 1998 Aug; 83(8):690-2. PubMed ID: 9793251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CGHPRO -- a comprehensive data analysis tool for array CGH.
Chen W; Erdogan F; Ropers HH; Lenzner S; Ullmann R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():85. PubMed ID: 15807904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hardware and software requirements for quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
du Manoir S; Kallioniemi OP; Lichter P; Piper J; Benedetti PA; Carothers AD; Fantes JA; García-Sagredo JM; Gerdes T; Giollant M
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 7705183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of a nontumorigenic human breast epithelial cell line that eventually turns tumorigenic: validation of an analytical approach combining karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, chromosome painting, and single-locus fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Nielsen KV; Niebuhr E; Ejlertsen B; Holstebroe S; Madsen MW; Briand P; Mouridsen HT; Bolund L
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Sep; 20(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 9290951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome signatures of colon carcinoma cell lines.
Kleivi K; Teixeira MR; Eknaes M; Diep CB; Jakobsen KS; Hamelin R; Lothe RA
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Dec; 155(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 15571797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH.
Speicher MR; Gwyn Ballard S; Ward DC
Nat Genet; 1996 Apr; 12(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 8630489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of chromosomal imbalances in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder by comparative genomic hybridization.
Voorter C; Joos S; Bringuier PP; Vallinga M; Poddighe P; Schalken J; du Manoir S; Ramaekers F; Lichter P; Hopman A
Am J Pathol; 1995 Jun; 146(6):1341-54. PubMed ID: 7778674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic abnormalities associated with nodal metastasis in head and neck cancer.
Wreesmann VB; Wang D; Goberdhan A; Prasad M; Ngai I; Schnaser EA; Sacks PG; Singh B
Head Neck; 2004 Jan; 26(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 14724901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparative genomic hybridization(CGH)].
Matsuta M; Nishiya I
Hum Cell; 1993 Sep; 6(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8297821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
Rao PH
Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
