These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7705181)

  • 41. The cytogenetic view of standard comparative genomic hybridization (CGH): deletions of 20q in human leukemia as a measure of the sensitivity of the technique.
    Brecevic L; Verdorfer I; Saul W; Trautmann U; Gebhart E
    Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(1A):89-92. PubMed ID: 11299794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative genomic hybridization and karyotyping of human embryonic stem cells reveals the occurrence of an isodicentric X chromosome after long-term cultivation.
    Inzunza J; Sahlén S; Holmberg K; Strömberg AM; Teerijoki H; Blennow E; Hovatta O; Malmgren H
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 10(6):461-6. PubMed ID: 15044603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Four-color CGH: a new method for quality control of comparative genomic hybridization.
    Karhu R; Rummukainen J; Lörch T; Isola J
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Feb; 24(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 9885977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Y chromosome loss and other genomic alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines analyzed by CGH and CGH array.
    Park SJ; Jeong SY; Kim HJ
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2006 Apr; 166(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 16616112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparative genomic hybridization: an overview.
    Houldsworth J; Chaganti RS
    Am J Pathol; 1994 Dec; 145(6):1253-60. PubMed ID: 7992829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cross-platform array comparative genomic hybridization meta-analysis separates hematopoietic and mesenchymal from epithelial tumors.
    Jong K; Marchiori E; van der Vaart A; Chin SF; Carvalho B; Tijssen M; Eijk PP; van den Ijssel P; Grabsch H; Quirke P; Oudejans JJ; Meijer GA; Caldas C; Ylstra B
    Oncogene; 2007 Mar; 26(10):1499-506. PubMed ID: 16936777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A versatile image analysis approach for simultaneous chromosome identification and localization of FISH probes.
    Christian A; McNiel E; Robinson J; Drabek R; LaRue S; Waldren C; Bedford J
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1998; 82(3-4):172-9. PubMed ID: 9858810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative genomic hybridization: a comparison with molecular and cytogenetic analysis.
    Nacheva EP; Grace CD; Bittner M; Ledbetter DH; Jenkins RB; Green AR
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1998 Jan; 100(2):93-105. PubMed ID: 9428351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Genetic analysis of drug resistance by reverse in situ hybridization.
    Keith WN
    Methods Mol Med; 1999; 28():225-33. PubMed ID: 21374041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative genomic hybridization: practical guidelines.
    Jeuken JW; Sprenger SH; Wesseling P
    Diagn Mol Pathol; 2002 Dec; 11(4):193-203. PubMed ID: 12459635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparative genomic hybridization: a new tool in cancer pathology.
    Hermsen MA; Meijer GA; Baak JP; Joenje H; Walboomers JJ
    Hum Pathol; 1996 Apr; 27(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 8617476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative genomic hybridization in hypotriploid/hyperdiploid tumors.
    Rosenberg C; Schut TB; Mostert MC; Tanke HJ; Raap AK; Oosterhuis JW; Looijenga LH
    Cytometry; 1997 Oct; 29(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 9332817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analyses of brain tumor cell lines confirm a simple model of relationships among fluorescence in situ hybridization, DNA index, and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Mohapatra G; Moore DH; Kim DH; Grewal L; Hyun WC; Waldman FM; Pinkel D; Feuerstein BG
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Dec; 20(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 9408746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Analysis program for quantitative detection of chromosome aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization].
    Roth K; Wolf G; Dietel M; Petersen I
    Pathologe; 1996 Sep; 17(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 8992476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Karyotyping of comparative genomic hybridization human metaphases by using support vector machines.
    Kou Z; Ji L; Zhang X
    Cytometry; 2002 Jan; 47(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11774345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Robust band profile extraction using constrained nonparametric machine-learning technique.
    Khan S; Sanches J; Ventura R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Oct; 57(10):2587-91. PubMed ID: 20643597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Chromosome analysis using image processing. Recent aspects and perspectives].
    Malet P; Geneix A; Bonton P; Grouche L; Perissel B
    Ann Genet; 1989; 32(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 2683979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A t-statistic for objective interpretation of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) profiles.
    Moore DH; Pallavicini M; Cher ML; Gray JW
    Cytometry; 1997 Jul; 28(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 9222102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. High-resolution comparative hybridization to combed DNA fibers.
    Kraus J; Weber RG; Cremer M; Seebacher T; Fischer C; Schurra C; Jauch A; Lichter P; Bensimon A; Cremer T
    Hum Genet; 1997 Mar; 99(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 9050926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mapping segmental imbalances using comparative genomic hybridization and eigenanalysis.
    Haddad B; Antonacci R; Rizzu P; Lindsay EA; Hughes MR; Smith LC; Knapp RD; Baldini A
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1995; 71(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 7587393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.