171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7705182)
1. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
du Manoir S; Schröck E; Bentz M; Speicher MR; Joos S; Ried T; Lichter P; Cremer T
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 7705182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
Piper J; Rutovitz D; Sudar D; Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 7705181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization.
Lundsteen C; Maahr J; Christensen B; Bryndorf T; Bentz M; Lichter P; Gerdes T
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 7705184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) in detection of chromosomal abnormalities in children with acute leukaemia.
Vranova V; Mentzlova D; Oltova A; Linkova V; Zezulkova D; Filkova H; Mendelova D; Sterba J; Kuglik P
Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18190236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spectral karyotyping analysis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Singh B; Gogineni S; Goberdhan A; Sacks P; Shaha A; Shah J; Rao P
Laryngoscope; 2001 Sep; 111(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 11568603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of renal cell carcinoma by CGH, multicolor-FISH and conventional cytogenic banding analysis.
Sanjmyatav J; Schubert J; Junker K
Oncol Rep; 2005 Nov; 14(5):1183-7. PubMed ID: 16211283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH.
Speicher MR; Gwyn Ballard S; Ward DC
Nat Genet; 1996 Apr; 12(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 8630489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative genomic hybridization of human malignant gliomas reveals multiple amplification sites and nonrandom chromosomal gains and losses.
Schröck E; Thiel G; Lozanova T; du Manoir S; Meffert MC; Jauch A; Speicher MR; Nürnberg P; Vogel S; Jänisch W
Am J Pathol; 1994 Jun; 144(6):1203-18. PubMed ID: 8203461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of a nontumorigenic human breast epithelial cell line that eventually turns tumorigenic: validation of an analytical approach combining karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, chromosome painting, and single-locus fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Nielsen KV; Niebuhr E; Ejlertsen B; Holstebroe S; Madsen MW; Briand P; Mouridsen HT; Bolund L
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Sep; 20(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 9290951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals.
Kirchhoff M; Gerdes T; Rose H; Maahr J; Ottesen AM; Lundsteen C
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 9515715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic diagnosis by comparative genomic hybridization in adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia.
Casas S; Aventín A; Fuentes F; Vallespí T; Granada I; Carrió A; Angel Martínez-Climent J; Solé F; Teixidó M; Bernués M; Duarte J; Maria Hernández J; Brunet S; Dolors Coll M; Sierra J
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Aug; 153(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 15325089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Key technologies in image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization].
Ni J; Ji L; Wang M
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 18(4):620-3. PubMed ID: 11791323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
Rao PH
Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative genomic hybridization: technical development and cytogenetic aspects for routine use in clinical laboratories.
Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Da Silva F; Collot N; Hervy N; Wiss J; Tachdjian G
Ann Genet; 1998; 41(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 9599653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative genomic hybridization(CGH)].
Matsuta M; Nishiya I
Hum Cell; 1993 Sep; 6(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8297821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
