These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7705182)

  • 1. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
    du Manoir S; Schröck E; Bentz M; Speicher MR; Joos S; Ried T; Lichter P; Cremer T
    Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 7705182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
    Piper J; Rutovitz D; Sudar D; Kallioniemi A; Kallioniemi OP; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
    Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):10-26. PubMed ID: 7705181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization.
    Lundsteen C; Maahr J; Christensen B; Bryndorf T; Bentz M; Lichter P; Gerdes T
    Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 7705184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
    du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
    Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
    Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
    Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) in detection of chromosomal abnormalities in children with acute leukaemia.
    Vranova V; Mentzlova D; Oltova A; Linkova V; Zezulkova D; Filkova H; Mendelova D; Sterba J; Kuglik P
    Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18190236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectral karyotyping analysis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Singh B; Gogineni S; Goberdhan A; Sacks P; Shaha A; Shah J; Rao P
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Sep; 111(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 11568603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
    Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
    Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of renal cell carcinoma by CGH, multicolor-FISH and conventional cytogenic banding analysis.
    Sanjmyatav J; Schubert J; Junker K
    Oncol Rep; 2005 Nov; 14(5):1183-7. PubMed ID: 16211283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH.
    Speicher MR; Gwyn Ballard S; Ward DC
    Nat Genet; 1996 Apr; 12(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 8630489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative genomic hybridization of human malignant gliomas reveals multiple amplification sites and nonrandom chromosomal gains and losses.
    Schröck E; Thiel G; Lozanova T; du Manoir S; Meffert MC; Jauch A; Speicher MR; Nürnberg P; Vogel S; Jänisch W
    Am J Pathol; 1994 Jun; 144(6):1203-18. PubMed ID: 8203461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
    Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
    Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of a nontumorigenic human breast epithelial cell line that eventually turns tumorigenic: validation of an analytical approach combining karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, chromosome painting, and single-locus fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Nielsen KV; Niebuhr E; Ejlertsen B; Holstebroe S; Madsen MW; Briand P; Mouridsen HT; Bolund L
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Sep; 20(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 9290951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals.
    Kirchhoff M; Gerdes T; Rose H; Maahr J; Ottesen AM; Lundsteen C
    Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 9515715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic diagnosis by comparative genomic hybridization in adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia.
    Casas S; Aventín A; Fuentes F; Vallespí T; Granada I; Carrió A; Angel Martínez-Climent J; Solé F; Teixidó M; Bernués M; Duarte J; Maria Hernández J; Brunet S; Dolors Coll M; Sierra J
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Aug; 153(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 15325089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Key technologies in image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization].
    Ni J; Ji L; Wang M
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 18(4):620-3. PubMed ID: 11791323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
    Rao PH
    Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative genomic hybridization: technical development and cytogenetic aspects for routine use in clinical laboratories.
    Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Da Silva F; Collot N; Hervy N; Wiss J; Tachdjian G
    Ann Genet; 1998; 41(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 9599653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative genomic hybridization(CGH)].
    Matsuta M; Nishiya I
    Hum Cell; 1993 Sep; 6(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8297821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.