These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7705182)

  • 41. [CGH (comparative genomic hybridization)].
    Sakamoto M; Sakamoto H; Suehiro Y; Akiya T; Iwabuchi H; Sakunaga H; Muroya T; Noda T; Sugishita T; Tenjin Y
    Nihon Rinsho; 1996 Apr; 54(4):933-43. PubMed ID: 8920653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative genomic hybridization in the investigation of myeloid leukemias.
    Bentz M; Döhner H; Huck K; Schütz B; Ganser A; Joos S; du Manoir S; Lichter P
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1995 Mar; 12(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 7536458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Structural unbalanced chromosome rearrangements resolved by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Daniely M; Barkai G; Goldman B; Aviram-Goldring A
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1999; 86(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 10516433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparative genomic hybridization based strategy for the analysis of different chromosome imbalances detected in conventional cytogenetic diagnostics.
    Tönnies H; Stumm M; Wegner RD; Chudoba I; Kalscheuer V; Neitzel H
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 2001; 93(3-4):188-94. PubMed ID: 11528111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A versatile image analysis approach for simultaneous chromosome identification and localization of FISH probes.
    Christian A; McNiel E; Robinson J; Drabek R; LaRue S; Waldren C; Bedford J
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1998; 82(3-4):172-9. PubMed ID: 9858810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of breast cancer polyclonality by combined chromosome banding and comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
    Teixeira MR; Tsarouha H; Kraggerud SM; Pandis N; Dimitriadis E; Andersen JA; Lothe RA; Heim S
    Neoplasia; 2001; 3(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 11494114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Image analysis for comparative genomic hybridization based on a karyotyping program for windows.
    Roth K; Wolf G; Dietel M; Petersen I
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Dec; 19(6):461-74. PubMed ID: 9893900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative genomic hybridization.
    Roylance R
    Methods Mol Med; 2001; 57():223-40. PubMed ID: 21340901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cytogenetic analysis from DNA by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Tachdjian G; Aboura A; Lapierre JM; Viguié F
    Ann Genet; 2000; 43(3-4):147-54. PubMed ID: 11164197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Identification and characterization of a de novo partial trisomy 10p by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
    Benzacken B; Lapierre JM; Siffroi JP; Chalvon A; Tachdjian G
    Clin Genet; 1998 Oct; 54(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 9831346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Quality control of CGH: impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization.
    Karhu R; Kähkönen M; Kuukasjärvi T; Pennanen S; Tirkkonen M; Kallioniemi O
    Cytometry; 1997 Jul; 28(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 9222104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative genomic hybridization.
    Bayani J; Squire JA
    Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2005 Jan; Chapter 22():Unit 22.6. PubMed ID: 18228467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The application of microwave denaturation in comparative genomic hybridization.
    de Meulemeester M; Vink A; Jakobs M; Hermsen M; Steenman M; Slater R; Dietrich A; Mannens M
    Genet Anal; 1996 Nov; 13(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 9021402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Analysis program for quantitative detection of chromosome aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization].
    Roth K; Wolf G; Dietel M; Petersen I
    Pathologe; 1996 Sep; 17(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 8992476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Chromosome specific comparative genome hybridisation for determining the origin of intrachromosomal duplications.
    Griffin DK; Sanoudou D; Adamski E; McGiffert C; O'Brien P; Wienberg J; Ferguson-Smith MA
    J Med Genet; 1998 Jan; 35(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 9475092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Combined classical and molecular cytogenetic analysis of cancer.
    Teixeira MR
    Eur J Cancer; 2002 Aug; 38(12):1580-4. PubMed ID: 12142045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Significant hybridization differences in comparative genomic hybridization due to nucleotides used for DNA labelling and to DNA chosen for cohybridization.
    Wilkens L; Tchinda J; Burkhardt D; Kreipe HH
    Pathobiology; 2002-2003; 70(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 12679597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mitotic chromosome preparations from mouse cells for karyotyping.
    Akeson EC; Davisson MT
    Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2001 May; Chapter 4():Unit4.10. PubMed ID: 18428279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cebus paraguayanus and Cebus nigritus (Primates, Platyrrhini): a comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
    Nieves M; Mühlmann M; Mudry MD
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2010 Jun; 128(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 20389045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stylized chromosome images.
    Martin AO; Isenstein BS; Thomas CW; Rzeszotarski MS; Johnson WE
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 2307061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.