These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7705182)

  • 61. Comparative genomic hybridization for the analysis of unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities in ovarian tumors.
    Curtis LJ
    Methods Mol Med; 2001; 39():261-9. PubMed ID: 21340781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparative genomic hybridization: a comparison with molecular and cytogenetic analysis.
    Nacheva EP; Grace CD; Bittner M; Ledbetter DH; Jenkins RB; Green AR
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1998 Jan; 100(2):93-105. PubMed ID: 9428351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparative genomic hybridization: practical guidelines.
    Jeuken JW; Sprenger SH; Wesseling P
    Diagn Mol Pathol; 2002 Dec; 11(4):193-203. PubMed ID: 12459635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Genetic analysis of drug resistance by reverse in situ hybridization.
    Keith WN
    Methods Mol Med; 1999; 28():225-33. PubMed ID: 21374041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparative genomic hybridization.
    DeVries S; Gray JW; Pinkel D; Waldman FM; Sudar D
    Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2001 May; Chapter 4():Unit4.6. PubMed ID: 18428281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Mapping and chromosome analysis: the potential of fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Joos S; Fink TM; Rätsch A; Lichter P
    J Biotechnol; 1994 Jun; 35(2-3):135-53. PubMed ID: 7765054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. MetaSel: a metaphase selection tool using a Gaussian-based classification technique.
    Uttamatanin R; Yuvapoositanon P; Intarapanich A; Kaewkamnerd S; Phuksaritanon R; Assawamakin A; Tongsima S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 16(Suppl 16):S13. PubMed ID: 24564477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparative genomic hybridisation for the analysis of chromosomal imbalances in solid tumours and haematological malignancies.
    Zitzelsberger H; Lehmann L; Werner M; Bauchinger M
    Histochem Cell Biol; 1997; 108(4-5):403-17. PubMed ID: 9387933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The Art and Applications of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Endocrine Pathology.
    Kontogeorgos G
    Endocr Pathol; 2000; 11(2):123-136. PubMed ID: 12114818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Analyses of brain tumor cell lines confirm a simple model of relationships among fluorescence in situ hybridization, DNA index, and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Mohapatra G; Moore DH; Kim DH; Grewal L; Hyun WC; Waldman FM; Pinkel D; Feuerstein BG
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Dec; 20(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 9408746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization technologies in molecular diagnostics and disease management.
    King W; Proffitt J; Morrison L; Piper J; Lane D; Seelig S
    Mol Diagn; 2000 Dec; 5(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 11172495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparative genomic hybridization in hypotriploid/hyperdiploid tumors.
    Rosenberg C; Schut TB; Mostert MC; Tanke HJ; Raap AK; Oosterhuis JW; Looijenga LH
    Cytometry; 1997 Oct; 29(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 9332817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Karyotyping of comparative genomic hybridization human metaphases by using support vector machines.
    Kou Z; Ji L; Zhang X
    Cytometry; 2002 Jan; 47(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11774345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. CCD microscopy and image analysis of cells and chromosomes stained by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Tanke HJ; Florijn RJ; Wiegant J; Raap AK; Vrolijk J
    Histochem J; 1995 Jan; 27(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 7713755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Multivariate chromosome analysis and complete karyotyping using dual labeling and fluorescence digital imaging microscopy.
    Arndt-Jovin DJ; Jovin TM
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 2106421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Comparative genomic hybridization.
    Presti JC
    Methods Mol Med; 2001; 53():69-80. PubMed ID: 21318788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Mapping segmental imbalances using comparative genomic hybridization and eigenanalysis.
    Haddad B; Antonacci R; Rizzu P; Lindsay EA; Hughes MR; Smith LC; Knapp RD; Baldini A
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1995; 71(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 7587393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Improved sensitivity in comparative genomic hybridization analysis of DNA heteroploid cell mixtures after pre-enrichment of subpopulations by fluorescence activated cell sorting.
    Larsen J; Kirchhoff M; Rose H; Gerdes T; Maahr J; Lundsteen C; Larsen JK
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1999; 19(3-4):119-24. PubMed ID: 10866274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Chromosome analysis in invertebrates and vertebrates.
    Rowell DM; Lim SL; Grutzner F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 772():13-35. PubMed ID: 22065430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Gene Copy Number Analysis by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Comparative Genomic Hybridization.
    Kallioniemi A; Visakorpi T; Karhu R; Pinkel D; Kallioniemi OP
    Methods; 1996 Feb; 9(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 9245350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.