These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7705628)

  • 1. Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Latter BD; Mulley JC
    Genetics; 1995 Jan; 139(1):255-66. PubMed ID: 7705628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Latter BD; Mulley JC; Reid D; Pascoe L
    Genetics; 1995 Jan; 139(1):287-97. PubMed ID: 7705630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress and adaptation in conservation genetics.
    Frankham R
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):750-5. PubMed ID: 16033545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutant alleles of small effect are primarily responsible for the loss of fitness with slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Latter BD
    Genetics; 1998 Mar; 148(3):1143-58. PubMed ID: 9539431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linking inbreeding effects in captive populations with fitness in the wild: release of replicated Drosophila melanogaster lines under different temperatures.
    Kristensen TN; Loeschcke V; Hoffmann AA
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):189-99. PubMed ID: 18254864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of nonadditive genetic effects on early fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Fernández J; Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Pérez-Figueroa A; López-Fanjul C; Caballero A
    Evolution; 2003 Mar; 57(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 12703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage.
    Reed DH; Lowe EH; Briscoe DA; Frankham R
    Evolution; 2003 Aug; 57(8):1822-8. PubMed ID: 14503623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The efficiency of close inbreeding to reduce genetic adaptation to captivity.
    Theodorou K; Couvet D
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Jan; 114(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 25052417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decline in heterozygosity under full-sib and double first-cousin inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Rumball W; Franklin IR; Frankham R; Sheldon BL
    Genetics; 1994 Mar; 136(3):1039-49. PubMed ID: 8005413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduced inbreeding depression due to historical inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for purging.
    Swindell WR; Bouzat JL
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16780526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The variance in inbreeding depression and the recovery of fitness in bottlenecked populations.
    Fowler K; Whitlock MC
    Proc Biol Sci; 1999 Oct; 266(1433):2061-6. PubMed ID: 10902542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling problems in conservation genetics using Drosophila: consequences of fluctuating population sizes.
    Woodworth LM; Montgomery ME; Nurthen RK; Briscoe DA; Frankham R
    Mol Ecol; 1994 Aug; 3(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 7921363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice.
    Brewer BA; Lacy RC; Foster ML; Alaks G
    J Hered; 1990; 81(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 2273239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experimental evaluation with Drosophila melanogaster of a novel dynamic system for the management of subdivided populations in conservation programs.
    Avila V; Fernández J; Quesada H; Caballero A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2011 May; 106(5):765-74. PubMed ID: 20823908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of genetic purging under competitive conditions.
    López-Cortegano E; Vilas A; Caballero A; García-Dorado A
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1856-70. PubMed ID: 27302839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inbreeding depression and male-mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Miller PS; Glasner J; Hedrick PW
    Genetica; 1993; 88(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 8375666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seasonal stress drives predictable changes in inbreeding depression in field-tested captive populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Enders LS; Nunney L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Sep; 279(1743):3756-64. PubMed ID: 22719040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk assessment of inbreeding and outbreeding depression in a captive-breeding program.
    Rollinson N; Keith DM; Houde AL; Debes PV; McBride MC; Hutchings JA
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):529-40. PubMed ID: 24476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection and inbreeding depression: effects of inbreeding rate and inbreeding environment.
    Swindell WR; Bouzat JL
    Evolution; 2006 May; 60(5):1014-22. PubMed ID: 16817541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptation to desiccation fails to generate pre- and postmating isolation in replicate Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations.
    Kwan L; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2010 Mar; 64(3):710-23. PubMed ID: 19817849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.