These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7705736)

  • 1. Individual identification by means of conventional bitewing film and subtraction radiography.
    Andersen L; Wenzel A
    Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Mar; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 7705736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quantitative analysis of subtraction images based on bite-wing radiographs for simulated victim identification in forensic dentistry.
    Wenzel A; Andersen L
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Jun; 12(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9227082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 2.
    Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 22717955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 1.
    Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22717954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Matching simulated antemortem and post-mortem dental radiographs from human skulls by dental students and experts: testing skills for pattern recognition.
    Wenzel A; Richards A; Heidmann J
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2010 Dec; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 21239862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The discrimination potential of radio-opaque composite restorations for identification: part 3.
    Zondag H; Phillips VM
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 22717956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term validation study of bitewing dental radiographs for forensic identification.
    Kogon SL; MacLean DF
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Mar; 41(2):230-2. PubMed ID: 8871381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Anthonisen PN; Juul MB
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10867419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ROC analysis of observer-response subjective rating data--application to periodontal radiograph assessment.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Mar; 84(3):351-61. PubMed ID: 2024718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of dental radiographs for human identification.
    MacLean DF; Kogon SL; Stitt LW
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Sep; 39(5):1195-200. PubMed ID: 7964563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 11385199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental biometrics: alignment and matching of dental radiographs.
    Chen H; Jain AK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Aug; 27(8):1319-26. PubMed ID: 16119269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of marginal defects of composite restorations with conventional and digital radiographs.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Hellmich M; Noack MJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Aug; 110(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 12206589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy in establishing identity by means of intraoral radiographs.
    Borrman H; Gröndahl HG
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1990 Dec; 8(2):31-6. PubMed ID: 2130048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of dental radiographs for identification of children with unrestored dentitions.
    Fridell S; Ahlqvist J
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Dec; 24(2):42-6. PubMed ID: 17175835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-aided dental identification: an objective method for assessment of radiographic image similarity.
    Flint DJ; Brent Dove S; Brumit PC; White M; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 19040666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The value of examination aids in victim identification: a retrospective study of an airplane crash in Nepal in 2002.
    Bux R; Heidemann D; Enders M; Bratzke H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Dec; 164(2-3):155-8. PubMed ID: 16439083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synthesizing dental radiographs for human identification.
    Tohnak S; Mehnert AJ; Mahoney M; Crozier S
    J Dent Res; 2007 Nov; 86(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 17959896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.