These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7705736)

  • 21. Identifying skeletal remains found in a sewer.
    Goodman NR; Himmelberger LK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Nov; 133(11):1508-13. PubMed ID: 12462694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital subtraction radiography after stannous fluoride treatment for occlusal caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A; Halse A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):824-8. PubMed ID: 1488242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Endodontic imaging as an aid to forensic personal identification.
    Forrest AS; Wu HY
    Aust Endod J; 2010 Aug; 36(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 20666756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of victims from the M/S Estonia.
    Soomer H; Ranta H; Penttilä A
    Int J Legal Med; 2001; 114(4-5):259-62. PubMed ID: 11355406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Noise in subtraction images made from pairs of bitewing radiographs: a comparison between two subtraction programs.
    Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Nov; 34(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 16227479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of dental identification of individuals with unrestored permanent teeth by visual comparison with radiographs of mixed dentition.
    Gorza L; Mânica S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():337-343. PubMed ID: 29936401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The crash of Colgan Air flight 3407: Advanced techniques in victim identification.
    Bush M; Miller R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Dec; 142(12):1352-6. PubMed ID: 22130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Atypical Forensic Dental Identifications.
    Cardoza AR; Wood JD
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Jun; 43(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 26126345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy in establishing identity in edentulous individuals by means of intraoral radiographs.
    Borrman H; Grondahl HG
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1992 Jun; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1429933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
    Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies.
    Campobasso CP; Dell'Erba AS; Belviso M; Di Vella G
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2007 Jun; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 17525575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using radiographs exposed in a multicenter trial.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; Magnusson I; Johnson B; Meredith MP; Cavanaugh PF; Gerlach RW
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Apr; 31(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 8814584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique.
    Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Jul; 11(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 6378985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Variation in restorative treatment decisions: application of Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.
    Kay EJ; Knill-Jones R
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1992 Jun; 20(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 1623699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Principles of dental identification.
    Rothwell BR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):253-70. PubMed ID: 11370454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.