These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7706966)

  • 21. Performance of four chambers to measure sperm concentration: results from an external quality assurance programme.
    Zuvela E; Matson P
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Oct; 41(4):671-678. PubMed ID: 32843307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The performance of 10 different methods for the estimation of sperm concentration.
    Mahmoud AM; Depoorter B; Piens N; Comhaire FH
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Aug; 68(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 9240267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis.
    Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Primary investigations on the quality control for semen analysis in Nanjing City].
    Lu JC; Xu HR; Chen F; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2007 Jan; 13(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 17302033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Lenz RW; Kjelland ME; Vonderhaar K; Swannack TM; Moreno JF
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Sperm parameters in 113 subjects after recent fatherhood did not correlate with WHO standards].
    de los Ríos J; Cardona WD; Berdugo JA; Correa C; Arenas A; Olivera-Angel M; Peña RB; Cadavid AP
    Arch Esp Urol; 2004 Mar; 57(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 15074785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the Karras spermdensimeter in relation to the Neubauer counting chamber for sperm concentration measurement in boar semen.
    Vianna WL; Bruno DG; Namindome A; de Campos Rosseto AC; Barnabé RC; de Sant' Anna Moretti A
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Oct; 42(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 17845601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn Motility Analyzer for routine semen analysis.
    Sukcharoen N; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Apr; 78(4):182-90. PubMed ID: 7673804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of the sperm class analyser CASA system for sperm counting in a busy diagnostic semen analysis laboratory.
    Dearing CG; Kilburn S; Lindsay KS
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Mar; 17(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24359435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Capillary-loaded particle fluid dynamics: effect on estimation of sperm concentration.
    Douglas-Hamilton DH; Smith NG; Kuster CE; Vermeiden JP; Althouse GC
    J Androl; 2005; 26(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 15611575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy Evaluation of The Depth of Six Kinds of Sperm Counting Chambers for both Manual and Computer-Aided Semen Analyses.
    Lu JC; Yue RQ; Feng RX; Kong LZ; Xu YC
    Int J Fertil Steril; 2016; 9(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 26985341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative study of two computerized semen motility analyzers.
    Gill HS; Van Arsdalen K; Hypolite J; Levin RM; Ruzich JV
    Andrologia; 1988; 20(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 3207202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of chamber type integrated with computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system on the results of boar semen evaluation.
    Gączarzewicz D
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 26812825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of flow cytometric methods to measure human sperm concentration.
    Eustache F; Jouannet P; Auger J
    J Androl; 2001; 22(4):558-67. PubMed ID: 11451352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Peng N; Zou X; Li L
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Influence of the depth of the sperm counting chamber on sperm motility].
    Lu JC; Yue RQ; Feng RX; Kong LZ; Xu YC
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Sep; 19(9):776-9. PubMed ID: 24386852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A comparative study of the white cell pipette method and the Makler counting chamber method of counting spermatozoa].
    Menkveld R; Van Zyl JA; Stander FS; Conradie E; Kopper K
    S Afr Med J; 1980 Sep; 58(13):536-8. PubMed ID: 6893501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated semen analysis shows an increase in sperm concentration and motility with time in Makler chambers having excess sample volume.
    Yanagida K; Hoshi K; Sato A; Burkman L
    Hum Reprod; 1990 Feb; 5(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 2324260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Image cytometer method for automated assessment of human spermatozoa concentration.
    Egeberg DL; Kjaerulff S; Hansen C; Petersen JH; Glensbjerg M; Skakkebaek NE; Jørgensen N; Almstrup K
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 23606456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.