These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. The effect of category variability in perceptual categorization. Stewart N; Chater N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):893-907. PubMed ID: 12219797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Categorization and sensitivity to correlation. Anderson JR; Fincham JM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):259-77. PubMed ID: 8901337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning. Smith JD; Minda JP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The randomization procedure in the study of categorization of multidimensional stimuli by pigeons. Herbranson WT; Fremouw T; Shimp CP J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jan; 25(1):113-34. PubMed ID: 9987862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition. Nosofsky RM; Clark SE; Shin HJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):282-304. PubMed ID: 2522517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification in well-defined and ill-defined categories: evidence for common processing strategies. Martin RC; Caramazza A J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):320-53. PubMed ID: 6447192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exemplar theory's predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed. Smith JD Psychol Sci; 2002 Sep; 13(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 12219810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model. Nosofsky RM; Alfonso-Reese LA Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):78-93. PubMed ID: 10087858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An on-line investigation of prototype and exemplar strategies in classification. Malt BC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 2526852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment. Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Classification and perceived similarity of compound gratings that differ in relative spatial phase. Kahana MJ; Bennett PJ Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jun; 55(6):642-56. PubMed ID: 8058452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exemplar effects in the context of a categorization rule: Featural and holistic influences. Thibaut JP; Gelaes S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1403-15. PubMed ID: 17087592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Medin DL; Altom MW; Murphy TD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1984 Jul; 10(3):333-52. PubMed ID: 6235306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]