BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7707179)

  • 21. Auditory brainstem responses for click and CE-chirp stimuli in individuals with and without occupational noise exposure.
    Pushpalatha ZV; Konadath S
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):260-265. PubMed ID: 27762255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Successful detection of small acoustic tumors using the stacked derived-band auditory brain stem response amplitude.
    Don M; Masuda A; Nelson R; Brackmann D
    Am J Otol; 1997 Sep; 18(5):608-21; discussion 682-5. PubMed ID: 9303158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Usefulness of 1000 Hz tone-burst-evoked responses in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma.
    Telian SA; Kileny PR
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Oct; 101(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 2508024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory brainstem responses to broad-band chirps: amplitude growth functions in sedated and anaesthetised infants.
    Mühler R; Rahne T; Verhey JL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 23062881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Air-Bone Gap and Prolonged ABR Latencies in Mixed-Type Hearing Loss.
    Birkent ÖF; Karlıdağ T; Başar F; Yalçın Ş; Kaygusuz İ; Keleş E; Akyiğit A
    J Int Adv Otol; 2017 Apr; 13(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 27819648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 40-Hz multiple auditory steady-state responses to narrow-band chirps in sedated and anaesthetized infants.
    Mühler R; Rahne T; Mentzel K; Verhey JL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 May; 78(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 24613039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Auditory brainstem responses evoked by direct mechanical stimulation of the ossicular chain. Objective preoperative testing of candidates for implantable hearing aids].
    Hoth S; Lohaus M; Waldmann B
    HNO; 2003 Jul; 51(7):550-7. PubMed ID: 12904876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correcting for factors affecting ABR wave V latency.
    Lightfoot GR
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Jun; 27(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 8241970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of stimulus repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response in tumor and nontumor patients.
    Campbell KC; Abbas PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Dec; 30(4):494-502. PubMed ID: 3695443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interaction of click intensity and cochlear hearing loss on auditory brain stem response wave V latency.
    Oates P; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 1992 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 1541371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simultaneous acquisition of 80 Hz ASSRs and ABRs from quasi ASSRs for threshold estimation.
    Lachowska M; Bohórquez J; Ozdamar O
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):660-71. PubMed ID: 22568993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ipsilateral and contralateral acoustic brainstem response abnormalities in patients with vestibular schwannoma.
    Shih C; Tseng FY; Yeh TH; Hsu CJ; Chen YS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Dec; 141(6):695-700. PubMed ID: 19932840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory brainstem responses to CE-Chirp® stimuli for normal ears and those with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Cho SW; Han KH; Jang HK; Chang SO; Jung H; Lee JH
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):700-4. PubMed ID: 25997814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?
    Santos MA; Munhoz MS; Peixoto MA; Silva CS
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15605430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response].
    Mühlenberg L; Schade G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study].
    Huang LH; Deng XQ; Yang YL; Wang SJ; Tang XQ; Guo LS; Han DM
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting the type of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24105268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neonate Auditory Brainstem Responses to CE-Chirp and CE-Chirp Octave Band Stimuli II: Versus Adult Auditory Brainstem Responses.
    Cobb KM; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):724-743. PubMed ID: 27556524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tone-evoked ABR in full-term and preterm neonates with normal hearing.
    Ribeiro FM; Carvallo RM
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jan; 47(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 18196483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving the frequency specificity of the auditory brain stem response.
    Robier TC; Fabry DA; Leek MR; Van Summers W
    Ear Hear; 1992 Aug; 13(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 1397763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.