These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7707251)
1. Reading research critically: assessing the validity and reliability of research instrumentation--Part 1. Giuffre M J Post Anesth Nurs; 1995 Feb; 10(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 7707251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reading research critically: assessing the validity and reliability of research instrumentation--Part 2. Giuffre M J Post Anesth Nurs; 1995 Apr; 10(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7722945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. Marsh HW; Jayasinghe UW; Bond NW Am Psychol; 2008 Apr; 63(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 18377106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reading research critically: threats to internal validity. Giuffre M J Post Anesth Nurs; 1994 Oct; 9(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 7807409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing and enhancing reliability. Mottola CA Decubitus; 1992 Nov; 5(6):42-4. PubMed ID: 1489514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of nursing workload measurement systems: review of validity and reliability theory. Hernandez CA; O'Brien-Pallas LL Can J Nurs Adm; 1996; 9(3):32-50. PubMed ID: 8918773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finding and evaluating potential research instruments. Koop PM Can Oncol Nurs J; 2003; 13(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 14692363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tutorials in clinical research: part IV: recognizing and controlling bias. Hartman JM; Forsen JW; Wallace MS; Neely JG Laryngoscope; 2002 Jan; 112(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 11802034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological issues in conducting research on parent-infant attachment. Beal JA J Pediatr Nurs; 1991 Feb; 6(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 1990119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advancing nursing science in vulnerable populations: measurement issues. Strickland OL; DiIorio C; Coverson D; Nelson M Annu Rev Nurs Res; 2007; 25():27-48. PubMed ID: 17958288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Rattray J; Jones MC J Clin Nurs; 2007 Feb; 16(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 17239058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An instrument's conceptual base: its link to theory. Strickland OL J Nurs Meas; 2001; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11469140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a measure to delineate the clinical trials nursing role. Ehrenberger HE; Lillington L Oncol Nurs Forum; 2004 May; 31(3):E64-8. PubMed ID: 15152276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability. Higgins PA; Straub AJ Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How to evaluate study methodology in published clinical research. Stoddard GJ; Ring WH J Intraven Nurs; 1993; 16(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 8478779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reading research critically: statistical significance. Giuffre M J Post Anesth Nurs; 1994 Dec; 9(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 7707264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reading and interpreting economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis: an assessment of selected instruments for critical appraisal. Weisman MH; Gano AD; Gabriel SE; Hochberg MC; Kavanaugh A; Ofman JJ; Prashker M; Suarez-Almazor ME; Yelin E; Nakelsky SD; Croft JD; J Rheumatol; 2003 Aug; 30(8):1739-47. PubMed ID: 12913929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]