These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7707909)

  • 1. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels.
    Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Pettigrew RI
    Magn Reson Med; 1995 Feb; 33(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 7707909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study.
    Fürst G; Hofer M; Sitzer M; Kahn T; Müller E; Mödder U
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 7560312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images.
    Evans AJ; Blinder RA; Herfkens RJ; Spritzer CE; Kuethe DO; Fram EK; Hedlund LW
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Jul; 23(7):512-8. PubMed ID: 3170139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-layered model of Casson fluid flow through stenotic blood vessels: applications to the cardiovascular system.
    Srivastava VP; Saxena M
    J Biomech; 1994 Jul; 27(7):921-8. PubMed ID: 8063842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational simulation of turbulent signal loss in 2D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiograms.
    Siegel JM; Oshinski JN; Pettigrew RI; Ku DN
    Magn Reson Med; 1997 Apr; 37(4):609-14. PubMed ID: 9094084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shear-scaling-based approach for irreversible energy loss estimation in stenotic aortic flow - An in vitro study.
    Gülan U; Binter C; Kozerke S; Holzner M
    J Biomech; 2017 May; 56():89-96. PubMed ID: 28342532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experimental studies on magnetic resonance tomographic and magnetic resonance angiographic imaging of poststenotic flow patterns].
    Krug B; Kugel H; Friedmann G; Bunke J; van Dijk P; Schmidt R; Hirche HJ
    Rofo; 1992 May; 156(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 1596553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanisms of flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography.
    Urchuk SN; Plewes DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 1633399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blood flow imaging through detection of temporal variations in magnetization.
    Wolf RL; Richardson DB; LaPlante CC; Huston J; Riederer SJ; Ehman RL
    Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):559-67. PubMed ID: 1410373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of flow emerging from a stenosis using MRI.
    Gach HM; Lowe IJ
    Magn Reson Med; 1998 Oct; 40(4):559-70. PubMed ID: 9771573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of intravoxel velocity distributions on the accuracy of the phase-mapping method in phase-contrast MR angiography.
    Hamilton CA; Moran PR; Santago P; Rajala SA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(5):752-5. PubMed ID: 7981522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of phantom and computer-simulated MR images of flow in a convergent geometry: implications for improved two-dimensional MR angiography.
    Siegel JM; Oshinski JN; Pettigrew RI; Ku DN
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 8748485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical modeling of pulsatile turbulent flow in stenotic vessels.
    Varghese SS; Frankel SH
    J Biomech Eng; 2003 Aug; 125(4):445-60. PubMed ID: 12968569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamentals of turbulent flow spectrum imaging.
    Dillinger H; McGrath C; Guenthner C; Kozerke S
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1231-1249. PubMed ID: 34786764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of turbulent kinetic energy using 4D phase-contrast MRI: Effect of scan parameters and target vessel size.
    Ha H; Hwang D; Kim GB; Kweon J; Lee SJ; Baek J; Kim YH; Kim N; Yang DH
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):715-723. PubMed ID: 26968139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variable-density one-shot Fourier velocity encoding.
    DiCarlo JC; Hargreaves BA; Nayak KS; Hu BS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Sep; 54(3):645-55. PubMed ID: 16088883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical analysis of blood flow through an elliptic stenosis using large eddy simulation.
    Jabir E; Lal SA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Aug; 230(8):709-26. PubMed ID: 27146288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Velocity profiles in stenosed models using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rittgers SE; Fei DY; Kraft KA; Fatouros PP
    Monogr Atheroscler; 1990; 15():43-53. PubMed ID: 2136929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laminar-to-turbulence and relaminarization zones detection by simulation of low Reynolds number turbulent blood flow in large stenosed arteries.
    Tabe R; Ghalichi F; Hossainpour S; Ghasemzadeh K
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2016 Aug; 27(2-3):119-29. PubMed ID: 27567769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rethinking turbulence in blood.
    Antiga L; Steinman DA
    Biorheology; 2009; 46(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19458411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.