201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7709283)
1. Increasing neuroforaminal volume by anterior interbody distraction in degenerative lumbar spine.
Chen D; Fay LA; Lok J; Yuan P; Edwards WT; Yuan HA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jan; 20(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 7709283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ideal amount of lumbar foraminal distraction for pedicle screw instrumentation.
Infusa A; An HS; Glover JM; McGrady L; Lim TH; Riley LH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Oct; 21(19):2218-23. PubMed ID: 8902965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative changes in spinal canal dimensions using interbody distraction for spondylolisthesis.
Vamvanij V; Ferrara LA; Hai Y; Zhao J; Kolata R; Yuan HA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Feb; 26(3):E13-8. PubMed ID: 11224873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positional effects of transforaminal interbody spacer placement at the L5-S1 intervertebral disc space: a biomechanical study.
Tallarico RA; Lavelle WF; J Bianco A; Taormina JL; Ordway NR
Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3018-24. PubMed ID: 25007755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion.
Miyakoshi N; Abe E; Shimada Y; Okuyama K; Suzuki T; Sato K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(14):1837-42. PubMed ID: 10888954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paired cylindrical interbody cage fit and facetectomy in posterior lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population.
Wong HK; Goh JC; Goh PS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 11242387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in neuroforaminal height with 2 level axial presacral lumbar interbody fusion at L4-S1.
Marawar S; Ordway N; Jung J; Sun M
Int J Spine Surg; 2014; 8():. PubMed ID: 25694937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI measurement of neuroforaminal dimension at the index and supradjacent levels after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective study.
Cho W; Sokolowski MJ; Mehbod AA; Denis F; Garvey TA; Perl J; Transfeldt EE
Clin Orthop Surg; 2013 Mar; 5(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 23467381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.
Regan JJ; Aronoff RJ; Ohnmeiss DD; Sengupta DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2171-4. PubMed ID: 10543017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction of disc space distraction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest graft.
Cheung KM; Zhang YG; Lu DS; Luk KD; Leong JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1385-9. PubMed ID: 12838095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT-based Morphometric Analysis of Approach of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Zhang KH; Zhang WH; Xu BS; Dong XM; Guo L; Du LL; Xu HW
Orthop Surg; 2019 Apr; 11(2):212-220. PubMed ID: 30895721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Correlation between shape and direction of small articular surface in lower lumbar vertebrae and degeneration of intervertebral disc].
Tan L; Bai X; Li D
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1997; 22(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 9868088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Familial predisposition for lumbar degenerative disc disease. A case-control study.
Matsui H; Kanamori M; Ishihara H; Yudoh K; Naruse Y; Tsuji H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 May; 23(9):1029-34. PubMed ID: 9589542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
